Image stitching on the IPhone

Figure 1 - Panoramic Image of the Natick Mall taken with my IPhone 4s

Figure 1 – Panoramic Image of the Natick Mall taken with my IPhone 4s

I talked about image stitching in my blog of January 11 and there mentioned that it is possible, indeed pretty easy to do this with an IPhone or Adobe Photoshop.   A friend of mine’s eight year old daughter discovered it on his wife’s IPad and showed them how to do it.  Above is an example, a panoramic image of taken with my IPhone 4S.  I was going to give you instructions on how to do this, but discovered a little instruction video on the web.  Grid stitching is also available.  And you can also get $0.99 apps to make your life even easier.

Doing this in Adobe Photoshop is a bit counter intuitive.  Go to the “File” tab, chose “Automate” and finally “Photomerge.”  Again it makes a previously hard job really easy.  So then you get into the age old question.  Does making it easy lead to thousands of mediocre images?  Who cares.  Have a fun time being creative?

Maryam Freyda Figa (Wolf) 1886-1972

Maryam

Maryam Freyda Figa Wolf, 1911 silver gelatin print by Elias Halperin

A reader has asked that I post the picture of my paternal grandmother that I described in yesterday’s post.  It is contemporary with Andre Hachette’s portrait of Sarah Lievine and is a silver gelatin portrait taken and hand tinted by Elias Halperin, who was the husband of my grandfather’s sister Menuka Wolfowitz Halperin.  The image is dated June 9, 1911.

The date is significant, because my grandmother, Mary as they called her, had quit her job at the Triangle Waist Coat factory a few months earlier.  On March 25, 1911 in a sad and gruesome tragedy the Triangle Waist Factory, now the NYU Brown building on Washington Square, went up in flames.  The owners had locked the rear doors, so that the girls, who worked there, were forced to exit by the elevator in the front of the building so that they could be checked for stolen cloth.  Within eighteen minutes the entire factory was engulfed in smoke and flames killing everyone left inside.  Fortunately, for me, my grandmother was not one of them.

Mary married my Grandfather Louis Wolf five months after this picture was taken.  The wedding was held at “The Brides Residence at 54 Ludlow Street” in Manhattan.

I have blogged before at how wonderful it is to have silent faces look back at us over a century.  The have a message for us.  When the face is unknown, we catch a glimpse of their lives and create a story for ourselves.  When we know the person and know the rest of their lives, those eyes are filled with the wonder of expectation.

My grandmother was born in 1886 in Lomza, Poland.  She came to America in 1910 at age 24 full of hope and expectation.  My grandmother always seemed a timid person to my sister and me.  But she must have been an incredibly brave person to make that journey alone.

My cousin Ken Figa told me a story that has always haunted me.  When his grandfather, Jack Figa, my grandmother’s youngest brother, was asked what it was like to leave his family behind, he said tearfully, “I kissed my mother goodbye on the dock and I never looked back.”

I hope that Ken doesn’t mind my telling that story, because it’s very important.  Millions of stories like that define the great immigrations that are America.  I always love to look at that picture.  It always makes me think that (to paraphrase Edward R. Murrow), we are not descended from fearful men and women.  They were doers and they did what they did for us.  They had great expectations and they expected nothing less from us.  Anyway, that’s what Mary’s photograph means to me.

 

The appeal of Autochromes

Andre Hachette 1907

Figure 1 – Sarah Lievine by Andre Hachette, Autochrome c1907, from http://blessedwildapplegirl.tumblr.com/post/18202226926/maudelynn-sarah-lievintese-by-andre-hachette and in the public domain in the United States

In researching yesterday’s blog about Autochromes, I found myself exploring many of these wonderful images and trying to understand their artistic appeal.  I think that the image above by French collector and photographer Andre Hachette, an Autochrome of Sarah Lievine, taken around 1907 pretty much says it all.

I think that we subconsciously feel that pictures from the early twentieth century should be in black and white – that those three decades 1900 – 1930 were black and white.  I have a large photographic portrait of my paternal grandmother.  It is black and white and fits the mold.  She is every bit as beautiful as young Sarah, but she remains temporally distant from us because of the  black and white.

Sarah seems alive – as if we could reach out and touch her.  Because of the color, Sarah seems our contemporary, and we wonder if we aren’t looking at cast photographs from Downton Abbey, as opposed to actual inhabitants of the Edwardian age.

It is again the magic of photography that brings these ghosts of the past back to life.  You will remember how in the movie “The Wizard of Oz,” the black and white film suddenly becomes color when the scene opens in Oz, and Dorothy remarks to her dog, “I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore, Toto!”  The Autochrome Process ushered in something very new and magical, something now commonplace – namely color photography with its magical spectral dimension.  I don’t think we’re in the nineteenth century anymore.

Early color photography – the autochrome process

AdditiveColor.svg

Figure 1 – The additive color wheel from the wikicommons b Mike Horvath New version by jacobolus and released to the public domain.

Yesterday we discussed the fact that color photography first became practical with the introduction of the Autochrome process in 1907.  Autochrome was patented by brothers Auguste Marie Louis Nicholas and Louis Jean Lumière  in 1903,  It was the dominant form of color photography until the introduction of Kodachrome in 1935.  As many photographers lament, Kodachrome succumbed to the commercial onslaught of digital photography and was withdrawn from the market in 2010.  Kodachrome had a very unique soft pastel quality.  I think that you will agree, after seeing some Autochrome images here, that Autochrome also had its own unique appearance and aesthetic quality.

Color Receptors Human Eye

Figure 2 – The spectral sensitivity of the S, L, and M type cones in the human eye. Image from the Wikicommons and in the public domain.

Autochrome was an additive process (see Figure 1).    The human eye has three types of color receptors, S, M, and L cone types, each with its own spectral sensitivity, as shown in Figure 2. .  Color vision, in its essence, comes from the relative excitation of the these three types of photoreceptor cells.In additive color a set of primary colors, usually red, green, and blue is used for illumination.   You might imagine, for instance, that the image of Figure 1 was created with three slide projectors, projecting a red, a green, and a blue circle respectively.  Where they all mix equally you get white.  Essentially, any color can be achieved by varying the proportions of these three primary colors.

Lumiere

Figure 3 – A closeup of the potato starch particles in an Autochrome from the Wkicommons and in the public domain

Your eye will respond accordingly.  What does that mean?  It means that the different cone types respond according to the responses shown in Figure 2.  These responses are then interpreted by the brain to perceive color.  This is what we mean by physiological optics.  It’s not just a question of the laws of optics.  It’s the laws of optics interpreted by the eye and the brain.  Some will recall Plato’s admonition against trusting the perception of our senses in seeking truth about the universe (see for instance, Richard Tarnas, “The Passion of the Western Mind“).

This kind of additive color process is exactly how a modern LED monitor works.  There are three light emitting diodes that make up a pixel.  Each with its own color spectrum.  We tend to take our technology for granted, which we really shouldn’t do.  Think about how minutely small these diodes need to be, how perfectly the thousands of them must be assembled to create a monitor, and finally recognize that there is so little room for error.  You wouldn’t accept a monitor with many bad pixels.  All of this is why new technologies are so expensive initially.

Taj_Mahal_1921

Figure 4 – The Taj Mahal an Autochrome taken by Helen Messinger Murdoch for the National Geographic Magazine, March 1921 from the Wikicommons and in the public domain.

The reason that I am blithering on about how marvelous our digital technology is, is that I now want you to image that it is over a hundred years ago.  The only tools that you have are analogue ones.  But you want to do the same thing.  You want to create a minute color pixel matrix.  How did the Lumiere brothers do it?  They used potato starch.  As a modern technology inventor, I stand in total and complete awe of them.

Nieuport_17_C.1

Figure 5 -n Autochrome of a Nieuport 23 C.1 fighter plane 1917 from the Wikicommons and in the public domain

The Autochrome process works as follows.  An adhesive layer was coated onto a glass plate. Potato starch grains graded to 5 to 10 um where attached to this layer.  The starch grains were dyed with either red orange, green, or blue violet dye (an unusual color wheel). Gaps between the grains were filled with lamp black (essentially soot). A closeup of this “pixel” pattern is shown in Figure 3.   Note that if we are dealing with a two inch by two inch plate, this density corresponds to about a 5.3 MPz image – pretty impressive for 1907.  This fragile layer was coated with a shellac and then overlain with a conventional silver halide gelatin emulsion.  Because of the high sensitivity of these emulsion to UV light from the sun, a yellow orange filter needed to be placed in front of the camera lens when taking a photograph to block-out these rays.

Arnold_Genthe-California_golden_poppies,_Autochrome

Figure 6 – California Golden Poppies an Autochrome taken between 1907 and 1911 by Arnold Genthe in the LOC from Wikicommons and in the public domain

When a photograph was taken the colored potato starch grains acted as minute filters.  The silver halide emulsion was developed by conventional means and then reversed to a positive by what is effectively a bleaching process.  Since the colored starch matrix remains intact, when the positive image (say illuminated from behind) will become colored as light passes back through the filter matrix.

This process very successfully creates color images, which certainly accounted for its popularity during the three decades of its dominance.  It should also be noted that towards the end of its commercial span roll film versions were also successfully introduced. Several examples of beautiful Autochromes are shown in Figures 4 to 6.

 

 

Favorite Photographs for 2012 – and the winner is…

Before we get further into the New Year I thought that I should mention that, based on all of the feedback that I have received from readers, the clear favorite of everyone is not Ansel Adams “Moonrise,” but Edward Steichen’s “Flatiron Building, 1904.”  When choosing this image I very carefully sought out one of the colored ones as a opposed to the straight black and whites or the sepia toned ones. Take a look at each of these variations by clicking on the hyperlinks.  I suspect that you will agree with my selection.

When I first saw these bichromate gum colored versions, I thought that they were true color photographs.  But the fact is that 1904 predates the first true color photographs by three years.  Rather they are part of a long tradition of hand-colored photographs.  As early as daguerreotypes you can find examples of beautiful hand coloration.

While experimentation with color photography dates back into the nineteenth century.  The first practical and commercial color process was Autochrome. This is an amazingly clever process, which really deserves a blog of its own. There was a recent exhibit of autochromes at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City..

From an aesthetic perspective, I think that colorization adds to the mood of Steichen’s image of the Flatiron building.  It creates a dramatic sense of mystery.  There is a light level or moment at night when your photopic (color sensitive) vision starts to fail you  and your scotopic (black and white) vision takes over.  At that point you are not quite clear whether you are seeing color or not.  I think that the hand coloring achieves the sense of that moment.

Also, I think it profound that just as we demand and devour the latest technical advances, people of Steichen’s time felt that the spectral dimension of the image was missing.  And they needed it.  They developed hand coloration to an art form, in and of itself, and they pushed their technical innovators towards the solving of a very hard nut crack, how to go beyond the limitations of the silver halide monochrome process to create true and pleasing polychrome.

Image Stitching

A reader(ABW) has asked me to comment on a recent posting on the PetaPixel website concerning the creation by photographer “Michael “Nick” Nichols”, under the auspices of the National Geographic Society, of a giant image of the second largest Sequoia in the Sequoia National Forest, “The President.”.  I was all set to do so, when another reader (CJHinsch) responded so elegantly to my New Year’s Resolution post, expressing my desire to learn to photograph trees, and further pointed me to the work of James  Balog.  Mr. Hinsch really hits the nail on the head.  The real issue is not the marvel of how this is done technically, but the marvel of the tree itself, and that’s a very personal thing.  So more discussion on all of this needs to happen.

As far as the tree mosaics are concerned, the technical need for this type of image is the recognition of two points:  First, if you try to photograph a tree from its base, or suspended in another tree, or even from the air you are going to wind up with a pretty distorted image or a very tiny one from far away.  Second, that’s not how the eye works.  We see the tree in its entirety, then focus in on a few leaves, see them in fine detail, perhaps even notice a caterpillar.  Finally, we focus back and in our minds eye imagine that we have seen the whole tree at the caterpillar level of detail.  So if your desire is to reproduce the human experience “tree” in it’s full scale entirety, this is what you need to do.

Recognize that trees are not the only subjects that call out for this type of treatment. This happens whenever we are confronted by a subject that is physically larger than our lens can handle, unless, of course, we step way way back and lose all detail.  It should also be said removal of distortion is not always the artistic intent.  In the case of the tree images the goal is presenting a sharp and highly resolved undistorted image.  But there are other cases, making a 360 degree image of a landscape, where the distortion is intentional as a means of adding drama.  Moving frame by frame perpendicular to an image removes distortion.  Rotating around the axis of your tripod actually introduces a so called “spherical distortion.”

StitchingDoing a mosaic is conceptually pretty straight forward and is illustrated in Figure 1.  Imagine that I want to photograph something that is way too large to fit in my field of view, here the letters ABCDEFGHIJKLM.  In fact, my camera can only photograph five letters at a time.  What I do is take four overlapping images.  Then I reconstruct them by overlapping the images.

Now in the age of digital photography, this is an automated process.  Your Iphone or IPad will do it for you (have apps.) as will Photoshop.  When photography was a purely analog, this was a laborious and painstaking process.  But could be very effectively done, as witnessed by Ansel Adams’ giant landscapes for the Wells Fargo Bank.  It still is pretty laborious as the Sequoia project illustrates.  The desire is to keep things perfectly flat so as to minimize distortion and the need for corrected algorithms. In the case of the tree image the camera is moved up down and sidewards snapping multiple images on a hoist and framework.  The advantages of creating an image this way is that it is flat and undistorted and it has a much higher level of detail than could be accomplished with a single image.  In fact the major limitation in practice tends to be how big and at what resolution can you print.

That’s it technically, but like I said there’s a whole lot more to consider from a aesthetic and emotional viewpoint.

Boguslaw Strempel – forests and morning mists bathed in sunlight

One of the nice things about doing this blog is that I am constantly researching, which brings me chance encounters with wonderful images.  Today while working on a technical topic, I came across the work of Polish photographer Boguslaw Strempel whose images  of the forests and hills of Poland and Czechoslovakia are simply wonderful.  In particular, photographs of a nearly horizontal light flooding and streaming through forests and casting amazing shadows are quite breath taking.

A lot of bloggers don’t appear to give a whit about copyrights.  But please let me stick to my guns on this and point (hyperlink) you towards some of Strempel’s more spectacular landscapes.

This time of year, I’m usually driving to work at dawn.  And a lot of times the fog and the light make me wish that I had my camera with me.  So my advice to both you and myself is to keep these images in mind, remember to pack your camera, accept the delay of pulling over to the side of the road, and above all blast yourself out of bed and catch the light.!

Winter break 2012

BrusselsSprouts

Brussels Sprouts, (c) DEWolf 2013

I took a pretty extended winter break last month and I did manage a few photographs that were successful at some level.  So I thought that I would share them with you.

StreamSM

Winter Stream (c) DEWolf 2013

The first were of some Brussels Sprouts that were still fresh on the stalk.  I got a reasonable  tonality, and also got a nice effect by spraying them with water before photographing them.  I was impressed with the spiral form of the stalks and I tried to capture this.  Unfortunately, I wasn’t too successful,  and unlike Edward Weston, who just took his time and photographed until the vegetables were on the verge of spoiling, here the cooks were demanding and I had to take what I got.  They did taste good, however.

snowandice2

Snow and ice (c)DEWolf 2013

We had a snow storm the Saturday night before New Years, and Sunday morning dawned beautiful though overcast.  It seemed a perfect time to try out my new Canon 70 – 200 mm f/4.0 USM zoom lens.  Snow is always a tough task master, as it tends to bleach out and drive everything else into darkness.  Still I got a reasonably satisfying image of a brook near my house that I’ve been targeting for photographing for some time.  For some reason the image seemed to beg for sepia toning.  Since I’ve shifted to the Canon T2i, I’ve found that I generally like my black and whites straight-up and sans toning.

I also took an acceptable image of a frozen pond with snow.  It was a real lesson in dealing with snow.  It took a lot of processing including a very nonlinear LUT on the grey scale.  This can be tricky and turn the image into a solarization, if your not careful.  But the important point here is that I learned a lot.  Handling your equipment can be a bit of a pain, when you are wading in snow, carrying a monopod, and trying to keep your fingers warm.

The golden proportion – perfection in art and nature

SimilarGoldenRectangles.svg

Figure 1 – the “Golden Rectangle,” from the Wikicommons and in the public domain

As I indicated the “golden rule of thirds” is an approximation of the “golden proportion” aka the “golden ratio.”  The “golden proportion” comes from the ancient Greeks, so it must be cool and mystical.  But what exactly is it?

It is a special rectangle as shown in Figure 1.  The rectangle has a height, which we will call a and a width, which we will call a+b.  Now honestly that is true of all rectangles.  Since as long as the rectangle isn’t a square, the width is always a bit larger than the height.  So we might as well call that amount b.  But the “golden rectangle” has the special property that

(a+b)/a = a/b =ϕ

I know that a lot of you don’t like equations, but forget the equation.  All that I am saying is that for this particular rectangle, when I divide it as shown, I create a second rectangle only on its side, and that the width divided by the height is the same for both rectangles.  This ratio is so important that we’ve given it a name, really a symbol, the Greek letter ϕ, which happens to equal 1.6180339887, approximately.  “Approximately?”  Mr. Spock.”  “I try to be precise, Captain.”

Parthenon

Figure 2 – The ratio of the width to the height of the Parthenon is the golden ratio phi. Original image from the Wikicommons and is by Eusebius (Guillaume Piolle)(own work).

Now before we go off on any tangents, take a look at Figure 1 again.  You see that the line b is almost a third of a+b.  Remember the “golden rule of thirds.”  If you do a little calculation you realize that instead of being 1/3 which is approximately 0.33, the fraction is actually approximately 0.38.  And it is this division of the image that we are really supposed according to the Greeks, or the imagined Greeks, to be striving for n order to attain both geometric and aesthetic perfection.

So now take a look a Figure 2, which shows the Parthenon in Athens, what did the architects Temple of the Goddess Athena choose the ratio of the width to the height to be.  Yes, you guessed it ϕ!  Perfection in the Goddess is here symbolized by perfection in the geometry of the building.

Fibonacci_spiral_34

Figure 3 – The Fibonnaci spiral from the Wikicommons by Dicklyon and in the public domain.

Finally, recognize that one of the key points of the construction in Figure 1, is that the placement of a line a distance a from the start of the width create a second and rotated “golden rectangle.  This construction can be done on paper with a simple drawing compass.  This process can be repeated over and over an infinite number of times each step creating a smaller and smaller “golden rectangle.”  If you look at Figure 3, you can see how this process defines a spiral, called the Fibonnaci spiral (for the mathematicians I apologize for not going into the subtle differences between the Fibonnacci spiral and the Golden spiral.”).  This is very cool!  And cooler still is the fact that this spiral is the basis for a large numbers of forms in the animal world including the ram’s horn and the spiral of ancient ammonites as well as the modern chambered Nautilus.  We find all of these to be objects of great beauty.  So therein lies the basis of the concept that this ratio is fundamental to the concept of beauty and to be emulated in the division of an image.