Digitizing 35 mm slides

 

Figure 1 - Using a slide projector to digitize slides.  Insert top right shows slide projected on screen.  Method proved to be unsatisfactory because of the projector's lens quality. (c) DE Wolf 2013.

Figure 1 – Using a slide projector to digitize slides. Insert top right shows slide projected on screen. Method proved to be unsatisfactory because of the projector’s lens quality. (c) DE Wolf 2013.

I am a little perplexed, but I was doing some housekeeping on Hati and Skoll and discovered this blog that was meant to post on May 5 of last year, never did.  The world went on.  However, it covers what I think is a relatively important technical topic; so I thought that I would correct the error and post it today.

Recently, I decided to digitize my fairly voluminous collection of 35 mm slides.  This is not a trivial undertaking, but it does serve a couple of fun purposes.  First, you get to revisit all those “Kodak moments,” and second all the manipulations and subtle modifications that you wanted to do but couldn’t are no at your fingertips.

Actually, this last point is interesting.  In the glory days of film, you had three choices: take slides, where once you mastered the medium, what you took was what you got; take color prints, where what you got was invariably washed out by the commercial lab’s print machine’s compulsion to set overall intensity to neutral gray;  do your own color work, which was a truly daunting task, because of the level of temperature control required. This is not to mention expense. This all sounds like whining, but is pretty much true.

So, I went to the closet and unearthed the hundred of slides that I have squirreled away there and sorted them out into three not so neat piles: rejects, maybes, and definites.  So far so good.  Now I had to figure out out how to digitize them.  1. flatbed scanner? – don’t even think about it. 2.   Have a service do it for you? – I’ve had bad experiences with this, but obviously it’s going to depend on the service and their equipment. 3. – get a slide copier? – I’ve not been happy with the sharpness this provides, but others have had success. 4. Get a slide copying attachment that screws into the from of a camera lens? – I’ve read such bad reviews of this approach that I decide that even at ~$40  it wasn’t worth the effort. 5. Put the slides in a slide trade.  Put the slide tray in a projector. Project the slides on a sheet of paper, and take digital images.  6. Put the slides one by one on a viewing box and copy them with some kind of closeup lens system.

Figure 2 - Using a clos-up lens and opalescent light box to digitize slides. (c) DE Wolf 2013.

Figure 2 – Using a close-up lens and opalescent light box to digitize slides. (c) DE Wolf 2013.

The first method that I tried is number 5, and I have an picture of my setup in Figure 1.  Basically, you’ve got a slide projector, which tips the image slight vertically and then the camera behind the projector with a compensating tilt.  This would be so great and convenient, if it worked.  The problem is that the projector lens is the rate limiting factor.  I chose a Leica Slide Projector in the hopes that the lens would be up to the job.  And bottom line there is nothing that I hate more than a fuzzy picture. REJECT!

So then I setup the system shown in Figure 2, which is method 6 above.  Since it works well let me explain it in detail.

  1. Slide is copiously clean with compressed air.
  2. Slide is placed emulsion side up (that’s the duller side) on an opalescence (untextured) light box.  Again the box is tilted and the camera has a compensating tilt so that it is perpendicular to the light box. You can also obviously use a copying stand, or use a piece of opalescent plastic taped to a window.  Note the black paper jig that I built to mask out excess light and hold the slide in place.  This way you will get the exposure right and also there will be no glare in the image.  It is important to position the slide so bottom is bottom and top is top, that is so that the subject looks right.
  3. I am using a zoom lens at 100 mm focal length, with manual focus, and there is a closeup extension tube on the camera body.  I had some interesting problems with this.  First, my Tamron zoom lens was not up to the job of getting a crisp image.  It never is.  I then tried my Canon EFS 18-55 mm zoom and found that it would not work with my extension tube.  the electrical connection wouldn’t work.  I then resorted to my Canon L Series 70 to 200 mm zoom.  This worked beautifully, with the one exception that the ideal is to totally fill the field of view with the image.  I had to settle for only half filling the field of view.  However, my Canon T2i offered enough pixels that this was not a serious drawback (as you will see).  I set the f-number to 7.0, because as we have shown previously this is approximately where maximum sharpness is achieved on a flat subject.  I shot at 100 ISO and adjusted the exposure compensation according to the detail on each slide.  (Yes, this is a lot of work.  But it is worth the effort).  I always take raw image format. FOCUS VERY CAREFULLY!
  4. Next take the picture, making sure that things look right in terms of the focus and the dynamic range.
  5. Convert the image to a TIF file.
  6. Next in your image processor you NEED TO FLIP THE IMAGE HORIZONTALLY.  That is you need to make a mirror image.
  7. Then crop the picture to get rid of any images of cardboard.
  8. Then adjust the levels to set a reasonable white, black, and gamma.
  9. You are now ready to make any additional adjustments.  One important point is sharpening.  I tend to use Smart Sharpen for Lens Blur in Adobe Photoshop.  I usually sharpen between 4.0 and 8.0 pixels (depending upon the subject) with an average of about 6.0.  If you need to sharpen more, you’ve got a lens or focusing problem.

As an example, Figure 3 shows and image that I took of the San Francisco skyline from the Sausilto Ferry in 1975.

Figure 3 - "San Francisco from the Sausilito Ferry, 1975," Digitized 35 mm Kodachrome Transparency." (c) DE Wolf 2013.

Figure 3 – “San Francisco from the Sausilito Ferry, 1975,” Digitized 35 mm Kodachrome Transparency.” (c) DE Wolf 2013.

 

 

 

Jumpin’ with meteors

First, we had “Dancing with Wolves.” Then there was “Swimming with sharks.”  And now the latest “Jumpin’ with meteors.” Oh BTW for you shark fans, “Sharknado II” is scheduled to be released in July.  But I digress – could not resist this story.  It seems that two years ago Norweigian sky diver, Anders Helstrup, went jumping in, or above, Hedmark, Norway and was almost hit by a meteor while parachuting and the best part is that he caught it all with his helmet cameras.    So we get both this cool still frame, with the meteor caught in multiple positions on its path and even a great video of the whole event. The meteor was in what is referred to as its “dark flight” when it has slowed and cooled down sufficiently not to be glowing. It is estimated that the meteor was a few meters from Helstrup and weighed about 5 Kg. Technically it doesn’t become a meteorite until it hits the ground.  Hitting a sky diver apparently does not count!

This, needless-to-say, kind of begs the question why Helstrup has waited two years before releasing the images.  The answer is that they were trying to keep it all hush hush while they searched, apparently unsuccessfully so far for the meteorite. Rocks falling from the sky?  The odds against this are, well, astronomical. And that’s lucky for Helstrup who probably would have been cut in half by the encounter if it had occurred.

 

Photojournalist murdered in Afghanistan

Sadly last Saturday (March 29th) veteran war photographer and Pulitzer Prize winner Anja Niedringhaus of the Associated Press was murdered in Afghanistan She and news reporter, and Kathy Gannon, were shot in the back seat of their car by an Afghan Police Commander with an AK-47 assault rifle. Ms. Niedringhaus was killed instantly, Ms. Gannon gravely wounded.  They were covering the Afghan elections.  It can truly be said that this is only the latest incident in a war where the boundaries between friend and foe have become inexorably blurred.

We have spoken often of the important role that press photographers have played not only in covering the events of the day, but also in bringing personal reality to gruesome realities.  And it is ultimately this reality that comes to shape world opinion.  Before photography war was a detailed story written in a newspaper.  With photography, with video the world was transformed.

And it is not just war correspondents.  According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, CPJ, 1054 journalists have been killed worldwide since 1992, fourteen already in 2014.  They cover not only war but: corruption, crime, human rights, and politics.  One has to marvel at the bravery of these correspondents, as we watch them reporting in their flack jackets from darkened balconies.  One has to wonder about their motivation and bravado. Why not jut stay home in secure comfort?  But without doubt they enlighten us in ways not otherwise possible and the world is indebted to them all..

Changes to the Hati and Skoll Gallery

Figure 1 - The Corrigan Gallery at # 62 Queen Street, Charleston, SC, (c) DE Wolf 2014.

Figure 1 – The Corrigan Gallery at # 62 Queen Street, Charleston, SC, (c) DE Wolf 2014.

It’s time again to update and make a few changes to the Hati and Skoll Gallery.  But I always like to start by thanking the growing number of people who are visiting Hati and Skoll and commenting on the site, through social media, and by email directly to me.  I appreciate your interest and love your feedback.

The changes today are fairly straight forward.  I have populated the “New Gallery” with pictures from my Charleston, SC trip.  Some of these I’ve posted before, and others you haven’t yet seen.

A wonderful spring to everyone, except of course to our many readers in the Southern hemisphere! 8<)

David

The face of the Devil on Market Street

Face of the Devil, Charleston, SC, (c) DE Wolf 2014.

Face of the Devil, Charleston, SC, (c) DE Wolf 2014.

If you’re a dieter, then let me show you the face of the Devil – something sinful and irresistible. We bought it at River Street Sweets, 100 Market Street in Charleston, SC, transported it back to Boston, and there it sits on a plate begging to be eaten.  This is a genuine River Street Sweet’s praline.  You are  lured from the street by a warm and wonderful smell, you are given a sample by a sweet talking confectioner, and then you are sent to the back of the line where you purchase your own supply.

I first encountered pralines years ago in New Orleans and as a physicist I am mesmerized by them .  It just does not seem quite possible to pack so much carmelized sugar and nutty wonderfulness into so small a space.

Have one by itself.  Have one with coffee. Have one with champagne.  But you must have one.Sigh!

 

Espresso, photography, and good company at the City Lights Cafe in Charleston, SC

Figure 1 - Greg Lampton-Carr at Citylights Coffee, Charleston, SC, (c) DE Wolf 2014.

Figure 1 – Greg Lambton-Carr at City Lights Coffee, Charleston, SC, (c) DE Wolf 2014.

My wife and I were escaping a very cold rain one afternoon, when we wandered into Charleston’s City Lights Coffee at 141 Market Street.    For people like me, this is just what you are looking for in a coffee shop: excellent coffee (made by people who care), wonderful coconut cake, and if you are looking for something more substantial breakfast and lunch.  It is just wonderful.  The cafe also features the work of local Charleston artists.

I love the ambiance of genuine coffee houses; so I asked proprietor Greg Lambton-Carr if he would pose for a picture against the apparatus and paraphernalia of coffeedom (Figure 1).  He was gracious enough to agree, and then my wife commented “watch out this is liable to appear on his blog” (which BTW it now has).  This immediately led to the question of what my blog is about, and it turned out that Greg is himself a professional photographer and blogger.  He is a South African, fairly recently settled in Charleston.  He works in both film and digital media.  His work can most recently be found in Oblique Magazine and Charlie Magazine.  I highly recommend a to Greg’s website.  There you will find wonderful examples of his fashion work (including underwater fashion shots), charming portraits, and wildlife photographs.

So what was meant to be a quick espresso and coconut cake on a cold afternoon turned into a warm discussion of photography and gravity waves.  As I’m writing this, back in Boston I find myself wishing that I was back in City Lights Coffee.  So anyone who gets the opportunity should really do so.  You won’t forget it!

Vivian Maier revisted

Last July, I posted about the discovery of an unknown photographer, Vivian Maier, and the website that now posthumously displays her work. Maier was a nanny and amateur street photographer, who chronicled New York City and Chicago in the 1950’s and 1960’s.

Maier died in a nursing home in 2009, on the verge, as it were, of being d”discovered.”  John Maloof bought a box of her negatives at a Chicago auction in 2007 for about $400.  A Google search revealed nothing about Maier.  But never-the-less he was drawn to the images. In 2009 he scanned some of the images and put them up on Flickr.  He had about 30 to 40,000 of her negatives.  Many of these were marvelously and cleverly constructed selfies in a mirror. Mr Maloof established a website of her work.  Now there is a just released documentary entitled “Finding Vivian Maier,” and we will be able to explore further the meaning of her work.

Ms. Maier had a wonderful vision and talent.  But she did not pursue photography as a profession, only as a pastime or, better said, as an artistic expression and outlet.  In a poignant way her story is the story of many of the readers of this blog and many of the members of social media photography SIGs.  You just have to look and you find some very serious talent out there.  It is truly an expression of the democracy that modern photography represents – and also of the freedom that digital photography offers in enabling production of a quality image so easily.  I have found that everyone has their own special and unique photographic vision.  It is like a fingerprint or even DNA.

Where does true artistic vision lie?  In Ms. Maier’s case you see something else that we have spoken of so often, and this is the way that photography transcends time and takes you back to now long lost places and days.  As someone who grew up in New York City in the 50’s and 60’s, I can relate ever so personally to Ms. Maier’s images – and I love them for it.  The people are there, captured in silver and electron states.  But they are merely specters.  The actual subjects have moved on inexorably through time.  And in saving Vivian Maier’s life’s work, John Maloof has truly given us a great gift.  It is the gift of vision.

 

 

 

Pause and smell the cherry blossoms

Well, there are definitely signs of impending spring, even here in the Northeast. For the last few days on social media my Japanese friends have been furiously posting glorious images from Tokyo of the cherry blossoms.  And frankly, I want to be there! Washington, DC is predicting, depending upon whom you listen to, cherry blossoms peaking next week or the week after.

So for today, I thought that Hati and Skoll would just pause and offer up for peaceful contemplation this beautiful picture by Toru Hanai for Reuters of Tokyo in full bloom.  Be sure to notice the little bird sitting on a branch in the picture.  Doesn’t this image just make you ever so peaceful and happy?

The Little Mermaid it’s not

Well, April Fools’ Day and I suppose that I have to pick up on the theme that I started on Sunday – of great hoaxes.  My favorites are images of great dictators and the people that they have airbrushed out of the photograph.  And there are a lot of those! But I always find these more and a little gruesome.  Afterall the people in question were usually “airbrushed” out of living as well – so a story more fitting for Halloween than April Fools’ Day.

So how about a photograph taken by Luke MacGregor for Reuters on June 7, 2010 showing an employee of Christie’s Auction house in London looking at a late eighteenth century hoax that was meant to be the mummified skeleton of a mermaid.  She was part monkey, part fish and part papier-mache. Ariel she’s not!