The melt

Figure 1 - The Melt, first day of spring 2015, Concord, MA. (c) DE Wolf 2015.

Figure 1 – The Melt, first day of spring 2015, Concord, MA. (c) DE Wolf 2015.

Yesterday was the first full day of spring, and I stopped along side the road to photograph this little grove of trees by a stream in Concord, Massachusetts.  My goal was to capture the sense of the spring melt.  This is what I refer to as an intimate landscape.  It is not a screaming vista but an isolated group of trees along a little brook. For me it epitomizes the wetlands of Eastern Massachusetts.  It is what I strive for in a landscape.  When I analyze my motivations I recognize that I have an ideal or standard set by the nineteenth century artist Samuel Palmer and my the early English calotype landscape artists. It is how I visualize the landscape – a soft creamy sepia tone and perhaps a just a touch exagerated sharpness so as to create a sense of an etching.  And I have come to realize that in the work of the greats like Palmer there is a key aspect of cool dampness that belies the richness and fertility of the soil, the emphasis of the landscape as a living thing

The frozen hair contest

It’s been I while since I brought you anything to potentially beat out the Wife Carry Races.  But you can rest assured that I am ever searching the web and the world for the bizarre and eccentric in human behavior and photographs.  So today, the first full day of spring, as February fades into an unpleasant and distant memory, I’d like to share this photograph of the winners of this years “Frozen Hair Competition” at the Takhini Hot Springs just outside of White Horse in Canada’s Yukon Territory.   This is something to think about the next time that you have a “bad hair day,” which is a problem that I never suffer from. I guess that the message is that no matter how cold it is, it could always be colder and you can always have fun if you simply embrace life.

The quantization of social connectivity

Hmm!  I keep coming back to a photoessay by street photographer Babycakes Romero on the BBC this week entitled The Death of Conversation that shows people not talking to one another,  instead engrossed in their cell phones. Romero believes that “Smartphones have made everyone seriously dull.” We have spoken a lot about this question on this blog as well as the related value, or lack thereof, of the myriad of cell phone images uploaded each day, and Romero’s view certainly has merit.

When I grew up in New York City years ago, if you wanted to survive on the street or the subways the key was learning to look through people indifferently and under no circumstances were you to speak to the crazy person on the train.  I had a summer job with the New York City Department of Revenue and there was this woman who would fight with herself, screaming and yelling, all the way to the Worth Street stop.  To my surprise, I was sent one day to deliver something the the “Eigth Floor” and there she was holding down her day job, while remaining a raving lunatic by night.  So abstraction is certainly a defense.  It may not so much be a rejection of other people as a protection of oneself against being rejected. And at the same time, it is reassuring that should you panic, help is just a phone call away. Your friends, your support are always there with you. My son told me that there are parties now where you leave your phone in a basket at the door and if you come back to it you pay a fine. There’s a way for enterprising hosts to make cash on the side, from friends desparate for that little blast of dopamine that comes with each text or email.

But as we have discussed previously, are we more or less connected?  Look at the people in Romero’s images.  The picture is one of self-imposed isolation.  Sure, but each one of those people is a node on a connectivity network, you know like the Borg Continuum.  If you believe in a world with six degrees of separation, then the network that each of those people are connected to is staggering in size.  In that regard, they are so much more widely connected than they would be if, perish the thought, they put their phones down and spoke to the people next to them.

The other image that Romero’s images bring to my mind is that what was previously a social continuum is now quantized into individual cells.  I keep thinking of the way that convective vortexes separate and create cells on the surface of a cup of coffee.  There are many physical systems that quantize in this way and interestingly the force behind the separation usually requires interaction between the individuals, even if it is a negative one.  A few months back I remember watching a pretty young girl at Starbucks pull out her cellphone and pose for a selfie.  It is as if to say, I am me, I am a quantum unit.  But I ask you, whom is she saying that to?  Would she have taken that selfie, made that assertion if there was no one there?

The isolation in the faces of the people in these photographs is in fact nothing new, it not only predates the cell phone, but it spans all of human history.  We are within ourselves.  There is the inner voice in constant conversation with us.  We assume, but can never be sure, that everyone else has their own inner voice.  So people are both desperately alone and desperate to be connected. Do not be fooled by the isolation.  We all still want to be noticed and loved. We all are still lonely, despite all our IPhones and selfies.

 

The unearthly Miguel Cervantes

The Victorians were big on postmortem photography – a last memory of the dearly departed, and if you think about it, it was not so unreasonable a use of the newly created magic art that captured just a bit of the person’s soul and placed it “forever” on a silver plate.  Of course, as we have learned from all those long lost daguerreotypes, “forever” is a relative span.

But a bit less forgiving of a person’s last demeanor than postmortem photography is posthumous photography. Last year I posted about the exhumation of Richard III in a English parking lot, and honestly Richard did not look so good, even worse than Shakespeare has him, which is pretty bad:

“But I, that am not shaped for sportive tricks,
 Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
 I, that am rudely stamp’d, and want love’s majesty
 To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
 I, that am curtail’d of this fair proportion,
 Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,
 Deformed, unfinish’d, sent before my time
 Into this breathing world, scarce half made up,
 And that so lamely and unfashionable
 That dogs bark at me as I halt by them”

I had thought, perhaps it was hoped, that we had seen the last of posthumous images. But no…..! Forensic scientists in Spain have announced that they have found the 400 year old tomb of Miguel de Cervantes.  They have exhumed a jumble of bones that appear to include Cervantes himself, those of his wife, and other family members buried with him in Madrid’s Convent of the Barefoot Trinitarians.  Several pictures have been released of the Cervantes’.   They are, not surprising in much the same state as the last Plantagenet king of England.   Which is perhaps not surprising in light of what Cervantes himself said about death:

Well, there’s a remedy for all things but death, which will be sure to lay us flat one time or another.”

Sycamore – Tone-on-tone

Figure 1 - Sycamore Tone-on-tone, Black Nook, Cambridge, MA, March. (c) DE Wolf 2015.

Figure 1 – Sycamore Tone-on-tone, Black Nook, Cambridge, MA, March. (c) DE Wolf 2015.

All winter long I have been eying several ancient sycamore trees off Fresh Pond.  These are the quintessential urban park tree.  In fact, all through my childhood in New York City I used to look down on one from my bedroom window or at the squirrels that made their apartment ever so close to ours.  The sycamores at Fresh Pond have spent the winter with their great bleached, arm-like branches raised up as if in defiance against the winter. Several times I had thought to photograph them but was repeatedly thwarted by the lack of sun or the intervening branches.

The light today was odd, overcast but bright, and as I looked up into the canopy at one of these trees I was struck by one of my favorite photographic challenges, the tone-on-tone, the challenge of pulling out an image of whites on a white background without exaggerating the dynamic range excessively.  Here was a case to be made for a truly white background.  I loved the exaggerated upward angle, the peeling bark, and the burred seed pods against the sky.  It was worth the experiment of Figure 1.

 

Canon T2i with EF70-200mm f/4L USM lens at 104 mm, ISO 1600, Aperture-Priority AE mode, 1/400th sec at f/20 with + 1 exposure compensation.

The melt

Figure 1 - Spring melt comes to the New England marshland, Sudbury, MA. (c) DE Wolf 2015.

Figure 1 – Spring melt comes to the New England marshland, Sudbury, MA. (c) DE Wolf 2015.

At last, but as is inevitable in the revolutions of nature, spring is coming to the New England marshland.  There is a special place that I like to watch the seasons change just off Landham Road in Sudbury, Massachusetts.  This past Saturday I made a special stop there, knowing what I would find.  The thaw had been melting the ice and collecting in huge puddles, and on this particular day our first big downpour of the season was adding to the effect and creating an atmospheric softness.

So far we are melting just right. After so much snow a quick melt and we will be inundated.  I am sure that the beavers in this little marsh are wary of that.  A few seasons back they were flooded out and would sit frightened and confused by the side of roads turned to rivers.

I had to cover my camera with a towel to keep it dry as I took Figure 1.  It was raining heavily.  And for that reason I decided not to slow myself down with my monopod despite the fact that it was pretty dim light and the lens that I was using had no image stabilization.  Would Fox-Talbot have laughed at us or would he have been envious?  Pleased with what I was getting, I took several images, and this was the first that I worked up.  I liked the glistening snow and water against an otherwise brooding scene and chose to stay in color for just a hint of hue.

Canon T2i with EF70-200mm f/4L USM lens at 100 mm, ISO 1600, Aperture=Priority AE mode 1/200th sec at f/7.1 with +1 exposure compensation.

Photographic first #16 – First portrait of a woman

Figure 1 - Copy of an 1840 daguerreotype by Charles Henry Draper of his daughter Dorothy Catherine Draper, th earliest extant portrait of a woman.  In the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 – Copy of an 1840 daguerreotype by John William Draper of his daughter Dorothy Catherine Draper, the earliest extant portrait of a woman. In the public domain because of its age.

By now you will have realized that there is nothing that I love better than digging into the photographic past and looking at the faces of the first half of the nineteenth century – so distant yet so close! It is both the familiarity of the people as it is the early photographers applying for the first time the conventions of classical art to this new medium.  It is significant also that we have an incomplete record. It may be known that there is an earlier example, but that is lost to us. Yet there is always the possibility that it will suddenly reappear.

Such is the case when it comes to the earliest example of a portrait of a woman.  Samuel Finley Breese Morse (1791–1872) said in 1855 that he had taken full-length portrait daguerreotypes of his daughter as early as September and October 1839. But these have not survived.

So for the earliest remaining example we have to turn to Figure 1 which is a striking portrait by John William Draper (1811–82), professor of chemistry at the New York University of his daughter Dorothy Catherine Draper (1807–1901),  The image is of a copy.  The original now in the Spencer Museum of Art, in Lawrence, Kansas was taken in 1840.

We are struck by the beauty of this image and by the beauty of this young woman of the early nineteenth century. She is a flower captive of her clothes, which perhaps aided her in holding still for the excruciatingly long exposure.

Several years ago I went to visit the Women’s Suffrage Museum in Seneca Falls, NY.  The first Women’s Rights Convention held in Seneca Falls, NY on July 19-20,1848; so thd the start of the American Suffrage Movement was contemporary with this photograph, and I was struck by the statement that the first step in the liberation of women was freeing them from the confines of their clothing. You have to be able to move, before you can move freely.

The pretzel that Hannah Stilley Gorby never ate

Figure 1 - Reproduction of a daguerreotype from 1840 of Hannah Stilley Gorby, perhaps the person with the earliest birth date ever photographed. In the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 – Reproduction of a daguerreotype from 1840 of Hannah Stilley Gorby, perhaps the person with the earliest birth date ever photographed. In the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 is a reproduction of a daguerreotype taken in 1840 of Hannah Stilley Gorby, who was born around 1746.  The around part is important because Mrs. Gorby is believed, by many, to be the earliest born person ever photographed.  This is a controversial point among people like me who worry about such distinction.  So I will not say it with any certainty.

I was thinking about Hannah this morning when I came upon an interesting article on the web from the Archaeological Institute of America  that the world’s oldest pretzel had been unearthed in Bavaria. Indeed, on Thursday this pretzel went on display in Regensburg, Germany.  “The remains of a pretzel, a roll, and a croissant, all dating to some 250 years ago, were found at a site where the remains of a wooden house thought to be 1,200 years old have also been unearthed.”

I am not sure that this truly represents photography news, but it is curious news just the same. And the remains of the deceased are carefully on display wrapped in styrofoam and mounted atop a photograph of a modern pretzel bavariensis.

When we look at the photograph of Hannah Gorby, we invariably wonder what those ancient eyes saw and we are grateful that she and her contemporaries spared the pretzel in question. I echo the comment of Regensburg’s mayor Joachim Wolbergs that “this discovery is really extraordinary, because it depicts a snippet of everyday life.”

I might suggest that it seems possible that the meaning of human life resides in a pretzel.  It is a snippet of life that we are oh so comfortable and familiar with that we can certainly see ourselves sitting down by the fire with Mrs. Stilley Gorby or her contemporary the baker of the Regensburg pretzel, yes to nosh on pretzels and to seek her view of things, her perspective, her feelings about the world and about life.  And all that would interfere with this bucolic if impossible scene, other than the realities of time, would be some artificial distinction of race, nationality, or religion some arcane point of philosophy that nobody truly understands but upon which we have constructed the prejudices of the world.

Behind Photographs

One of the great things about producing this blog is that it keeps me searching for new and intriguing photographs, and, of course, searching is learning.  Yesterday I found a fascinating portfolio by photographer Tim Mantoani entitled “Behind the Photographs.”  The concept is to create a portrait of a great photographer holding his or her greatest or best known work. These images were taken with a gigantic 20” x 24” Polaroid view camera – a major undertaking in and of itself.  But more significantly, the format enables both the photographer and the picture within the picture to be sharply captured.

These are beautiful images and they truly bring to life the faces behind the pictures.  Many of the images, are of the kind, to bring back memories and perhaps a shiver – Nick Ut’s image of June 8, 1972 showing nine year old Kim Phuc screaming in agony her clothes burned off by a napalm attack or Bill Eppridge’s June 5, 1968 image of Robert Kennedy lying dying on the floor of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles.  The images have served to define the events of our lives, and Mantoani’s project sheds them stunningly in a new light.

Perhaps, it is all defined by the photograph on Mantoani’s “About the Photographer” page.  It is a self-portrait where the artist stands obscured in front of the great view camera.  Only his legs are visible.  But then there is the giant inverted portrait of himself on the view glass. It truly tests the meaning of reality and also truly takes photography back to its roots, when it was described as capturing the otherwise fleeting image in the camera obscura.

The word “obscura” has always struck me as a bit odd.  Is the photograph meant to reveal or to obscure?  What does it reveal and obscure about the subject?  And at the same time, what does it reveal and obscure about the artist?