Frozen light house of Lake Michigan images by Thomas Zakowski.

Oh brrr!  It has been really cold here in the Northeast, so much so that I am wont to venture outside too much to take photographs.  Am missing a lot I know.  But when I look out at the Charles River frozen shore to shore in Watertown, I feel for the Canadian geese.

Well shame on me, a friend has brought to my attention a fabulous portfolio of pictures of lighthouses on Lake Michigan encased in ice.  Not just ice, but magical ice with wind twisted icicles.  This portfolio by Thomas Zakowski is spectacular and conjures up thoughts of the impending Fimbuvlter, when the wolf Skoll shall devour the sun and his brother Hati , the moon and the world will know no light. Mr. Zakowski is not afraid to venture out into the cold.

Enjoying his magical images by a warm fire while sipping hot chocolate sounds like an excellent way to spend a cold winter’s day.

The age of the drone comes to photography

Figure 1 - A photo drone positioned beside the moon.  Image from the Wikimedia Commons by Don McCullough and put into the public domain under creative commons attribution license.

Figure 1 – A photo drone positioned beside the moon. Image from the Wikimedia Commons by Don McCullough and put into the public domain under creative commons attribution license.

The Christmas holiday this year brought the news that Amazon was experimenting with drone delivery of packages.  While the big issue is bound to be safety to pedestrians, the age of the drone is coming and along with it the real possibility that you will be able to click the little “30 minute delivery” icon with your computer mouse and a half an hour later your package is delivered by one of Amazon’s “Octocopters.”

Some of the implications of this are, well, kind of chilling.  Technical advantage is fleeting and there  are lots of people out there with pretty nefarious motives.  So how this all plays out in terms of governmental control is going to be interesting to say the least.

Still from a amateur, or even professional, photographer’s perspective here is a whole new tool for photography and a whole new perspective on the world as well.  We have all seen the little helicopters being sold at the malls.  They go for about $30 and are good for scaring animals and breaking fragile things around the house.  One of the sights that amused me this past fall as I walked around the mall was a drone hot air balloon in the shape of a shark.  Children gathered on the second floor and giggled gleefully as this misplaced predator was guided from the ground floor tauntingly close to out stretched arms.

But there are some new products out there selling for about the price of a good digital camera that enable you to fly a camera around the neighborhood, hovering over trees, or you neighbor’s swimming pool.  Nude sunbathers beware!  Figure 1 shows a picture of one of these taken by California photographer Don McCullough.  He asked the operator to move it in position with the moon.

For those of you interested in exploring this technology further, a review of the latest version of this technology, the Phantom 2 Vision Photo Drone from DJI can be found in the NY Times.  This retails for about $1200.  The conclusion there is that it’s not a toy, or at least that it’s a toy for big boys and girls.  Also the camera suffers from  wide angle pin cushioning.  But maybe that’s the effect that you’re looking for as you zoom about the landscape.

Seriously though, what we are probably witnessing is the early stages of a whole new perspective for photographers.  You will no longer be limited by where you can carry your camera.  The sky’s the limit!

Follow-up on “Follow me”

Last March I posted about Murad Osmann and his Instagram sensation “Follow-me.”  Osmann has taken a truly rare perspective, focusing on the back of his girlfriend Nataly Zakharova as she leads him all around the world.  Each picture is shot from the photographer, or observer’s viewpoint, and you see Nataly’s hand as she reaches back and leads Osmann onto adventure in some dramatic world. He takes these pictures either with his IPhone or with his DSLR and then uses Camera+ software for processing.

Well, throughout the year this photoseries and mystery has gone viral, as they say.  There are thousands of fans following Murad and Nataly on their journeys.  But Nataly never turns her face.  That is until now, when she turned it for NBC’s “Today Show.”  Murad’s muse is finally revealed.  Both Murad and the newly revealed Nataly both informed us, they do it for love.

One more tilt of the hat for the New Year

I know that I should be giving up on the New Year by this point.  It’s old news and time to move on.  Still I found myself this past weekend checking out BBC News’ “Best Reader Photographs of 2013.”  So I am hoping that you will excuse me one more trip down the memory lane that was 2013.

One of the nice things about that BBC is that they feature readers’ photos.  So it’s not just about professional photographers from this and that news agency.  I was amazed at how many pictures from this past year’s BBC series I loved, that is even if i exclude the cute cuddly animal photos.

My top like from BBC 2013 is Samina Farooq’s “Puzzles and Riddles.”  I like the dramatic colors, the gesture of the hands, the enigmatic numbers on the fingers, and the black background.  It all brings new life to the Rubick’s Cube.

Then there is the wonderful photo by Manisha on the theme of “Hands.” This is a very well done and excellently composed example of perspective shift and ambiguity.  The transfer from the two size reference frames is seemless.  And I think that the floor tiles and the stairs really add to the drama of the photograph.  Placing them diagonally in the image adds a very dramatic effect that I do not believe would be there if they were pependicular or parallel to the image.  The complement the theme.

Next there is Alan Walker’s “Just a pink hat on a sunny day – to take your mind off winter.”  Frankly, I really need this about now!  It is truly freezing here.  I just love the way that the lip gloss matches the hat and the little sparkles of sunlight on the woman’s face.

I’d like to also mention the Zara Sumpton’s “A frame within a frame A self portrait taken with a disposable camera in the jungle, Ecuador.”   A hypocrite would also mention the kitten peering over the edge of a table in N Sishat’s “My kitten Prof. Piddles eavesdropping on a private conversation between my husband and me.” But, of course, I will not!

Whither the Tralfamadorians?

Figure 1 - Tardis time machine from the English television series "Dr. Who."  From the Wikimediacommons, upload by Zir, and put in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Tardis time machine from the English television series “Dr. Who.” From the Wikimediacommons, uploaded by Zir, and put in the public domain.

Well, I regret to inform everyone that no one sent me an email response to yesterday’s post before it was posted: no Dr.Who, no Petula Clark or Billy Pilgrim, no Tralfamadorian.  Not even the Time Traveler’s Wife bothered to respond ahead of time.  It was a bust and rather disappointing.

I am not ready, however, to rule out time travel based on this little experiment.  There are three possible reasons why no time traveler responded: 1. there are no time travelers, 2 no time traveler saw my post, and 3. no time traveler reads hatiandskoll.com or cares to communicate with us.

Do not discount the last of these.  Time travelers, in literature at least, are a rather apathetic group.  If you think about it, a major component of human endeavor is to change things to “build a life for oneself,” or “to make a better life for one’s children,” as examples.Your goal is to change or make the future. When you are “unstuck in time” as for instance Kurt Vonnegut‘s Billy Pilgrim, you kinda lose that motivation.  Nothing matters; because you always know what is going to happen – you become truly indifferent.

In our world religions the question of knowing and not knowing the future is akin to the question of preordination.  You do not want to become complacent and indifferent.  We have, for instance, Matthew 24.2 “Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.” And in religions were predeterminism is dominant, little “catch twenty-twos” tend to evolve.

You may have heard the arguments that when a supposed time traveler travels through time, (s)he is really traveling between alternative universes.  Such a concept solves a lot of the paradoxes of time travel.  For instance, if you go back and kill your grandfather you essentially limit the number of these universes that you can be in.  Although like Hilbert’s “Grand Infinite Hotel” there are still an infinite number of universes available to you. Albeit, fewer than the infinite possibilities that there were before.  I hope that’s clear! Then, of course, there is the question of what happens when two of these rooms are home to Dr. Spock, one young one old.

That concept seems to work quite well on a quantum level.  For bulkier sentient beings, such as ourselves, the argument of parallel universes seems a bit lame.  But who knows?

I remain a bit saddened that I received no comments about yesterday’s post until it appeared, which was after all the expected result.  I did breathe just a bit harder the moments before the deadline.  Such a message would truly have been rather unsettling.  And there is something reassuring about not knowing what is going to happen next.

Then there is the quote from Canadian mycologist Arthur Henry Reginald Buller (1874-1944) in Punch (December 19, 1923).

“There was a young lady named Bright,
Whose speed was far faster than light;
She started one day
In a relative way,
And returned on the previous night.”

 

 

Photographs and messages from the future

We’ve spoken a lot here about how photograph transcends time, how it enables us to see the faces and private lives of people of the past and how there is just a hint of them realizing that we are looking at them.  I know, I know, this is starting to get just a bit mystical.  But today, I read about scientists physicists Robert Nemiroff and Teresa Wilson at Michigan Technological University asking whether people of the future might be using the internet to send information back to us. Wouldn’t it be great to get a message from the future or better still to get a photograph?  Ok maybe not!

And it all sounds bizarre, I know.  So let’s begin with the rudiments of time travel.  We move in four dimensions: the three dimensions of space: forward/back, left/right, and up and down; and we move forward in time.  The equations of physics, in general do not offer a prohibition to traveling backwards in time.  So that has been a controversial point.  Is there some constraint.  Significantly, we also know if we have people on the Earth and people in a fast moving rocket ship they both do not advance in time at the same rate.  This is not mysticism but experimental proven fact.

I should point out that some people believe that the prohibition of time reversal lies in the second law of thermodynamics, which is the tendency of physical systems (Psst, you and I are physical systems) to chaos.  Sadly, every time we move information around, like in a computer or over the internet, we push the universe that much closer to chaos and absolute zero.  Gulp!

Well anyway, what Nemiroff and Wilson did was examine whether there was any prior knowledge of two major recent events. The two events they chose were the discovery of Comet ISON in September 2012, and the selection of Pope Francis in March 2013. Because time stamps on most of the internet can be either ambiguous or tampered with they chose to study Twitter tweets.  No signs of ‘Comet ISON,’ ‘#cometison,’ ‘Pope Francis’ or “#popefrancis’ were found. Too bad!

They also issued, last September, a request for time travelers to send tweets using either the hashtag “#ICanChangeThePast2” or “#ICannotChangeThePast2” by the end of August 2013. Again nada! At least there were no tweets which predated the deadline. Of course, some have been received since.

This second “experiment” is reminiscent of one performed by famed British physicist Stephen Hawkings in 2009.  Hawkings sent out a post-dated invitation to a predated party. I’m so confused.  But you can watch the movie of Hawkings waiting patiently for his guests from the future. Unfortunately, nobody came!

Still, I like the concept of someone sending us photographs from the future – giving us a bit more than a hint that they are looking at us.  So let me set this challenge. I am writing this post on Friday, January 3, 2014.  It will post at 6:30 UT on Wednesday January 8, 2014.  So you futurians have until then to send me a message, or better yet send me a selfie from the future.

 

The passing of Life photographer John Dominis

My town dump is big on recycling, and one of the  features there is a little unheated shed, where people share books.  It’s my favorite book store, the books are old and the price (free) is right! A couple of weeks ago I found a 1957 book entitled LIFE photographers, Their Careers and Favorite Pictures.  I took it home and it was sitting on a shelf unopened and unread until a few days ago, when I received an email from a reader alerting me to the passing of one of the great Life Magazine photographers, John Dominis.  Dominis died in New York City on Monday, December 30 at the age of 92.  I immediately went to the almost forgotten book and looked him up curious to see what were his favorite own photographs in 1957.  It was needless-to-say a half baked story.

Dominis has been praised for his ability to masterly photograph anything, and his career spanned the Korean and Vietnam Wars as well as the turbulent sixties and seventies.  So in 1957 his career was just beginning, and some of his most iconic images – the ones burned into our collective consciousness were ahead of him.

Many believe that his greatest image was his 1965 photograph showing Mickey Mantle tossing his helmet in disgust after a terrible at-bat.  This is one of those pictures that tells the whole story without words.  It is a most eloquent pictures of a great athlete in decline.  And remember that in the late fifties early sixties Mickey was one of the true greats. In 1961 there was a heroic battle between Mantle and Roger Maris to be the first to beat Babe Ruth’s home run record by hitting 61 homers in a single season.  I was at Yankee stadium when Maris succeeded.

For me personally however, his greatest image, the one the still brings shivers to me was this picture of defiant atheletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos on the awards pedestal at the 1968 Olympics.  This is one of the great defining moment images.  It contains in a single photograph all of the ambiguity of 1968.

So with the New Year we may reflect on the loss of a truly great photographer and at the same time we may reflect on an opus that truly helped define the second half of the twentieth century.

A ban on horse-drawn carriages in New York City?

Steichen_flatiron

Figure 1 ‘ Edward Steichen “Flat Iron Building, 1904.” From the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain.

I grew up in New York City and there were many fascinations there for a child – stll are.  My favorite place was the American Museum of Natural History.  There was an exhibit there about the evolution of the horse.  The horse, at one point in our history, was second only to man.  New York City at the end of the nineteenth century and early twentieth century was filled with horses.  That, of course, was when the exhibit was assembled.  But even when I was a boy all this was already fading.  We would leave the museum and walk down to Sherman Plaza, where the horse-drawn carriages still gathered to ferry tourists through Central Park.  My other memories  of horses was the horse head on the garage ,nee stable, across the street from my elementary school PS 61 in lower Manhattan and, of course, the police horses.

Today I pass horses every day on my drive to work.  Such are the advantages of living in the burbs.  These are beautiful, pampered horses that wear blankets to protect themselves from the cold, and prance about with an aristocratic air.  The horses in Manhattan are more of an ambiguity.  They are certainly an anachronism.  Are they pampered?  Are they stressed by the sights and noises of dangerously, heavy traffic?  Do they suffer in winter’s cold?

Like the horse-drawn taxis in Sherlock Holmes, they are a remembrance of a century ago.  We see them lined up expectantly along Madison Square in Steichen’s “The Flat Iron Building, 1904.” (Figure 1). There they are dim shadows of the past century.  There are other horses as well, in Steiglitz’s “Terminal, 1911” (Figure 2) there pulling a tram through the city snow.

New York City’s mayor-elect Bill de Blasio announced on December 30 that  “We are going to quickly and aggressively move to make horse carriages no longer a part of the landscape in New York City… “They are not humane. … It’s over.”  Does this mean that they horse-drawn carriages, the icon of so many great photographs and films, are soon to be gone?  Will the only horses that school children know in New York City be the bronze monuments?It’s all very controversial, and I am not going to enter the fray.  Photographically at least,  “times they are a-changin’.”

 

Figure Steiglitz, "Terminal. 1912," from the Wikimediacommons and in the public domain.

Figure 2 – Alfred Steiglitz, “Terminal. 1912,” from the Wikimediacommons and in the public domain.