Giving in to Bao Bao

It has been suggested, by a certain psychologist reader and friend, that I am not coming clean on this cute cuddly animal thing.  And I have come to believe that it might indeed be good for my mental health to admit that, like everyone else, I am a sucker for a good cute cuddly animal picture (CCAP).  Last week the Smithsonian National Zoo in Washington, DC introduced their five month old panda cub, Bao Bao, and, well what can I say, it’s a baby panda and the only thing cuter than a panda bear is a baby panda bear.  Friends, I cannot resist a panda bear and, yes, I will rush to the National Zoo as soon as I can.

And while I’m confessing to this foible, I need also to admit a love of everything sea otter and everything cat.  I am an ailurophile through and through.  I have learned a lot from my cat.  As our old friend Mark Twain pointed out about cats as teachers:

“A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.”
But I digress.  As for Bao Bao and his kin pandas, many years ago Disney did a study of what features in a face define cuteness and elicit a giant:
AWWW!
 The panda bear is quintessentially cuteness personified.  Did I mention that Bao Bao means “precious” or “treasure’ in Mandarin?
We have spoken in this blog about a lot of great photographs of terrible events.  So it feels good to speak about something wonderful.  In the end that is the very point about CCAPs.  They make us happy, and no one can say that making people happy is any less a noble purpose of a photograph than making them sad.
All right, all right!  Do I get to post a picture of a baby panda now?  I included a link above showing five month old Bao Bao’s debut.  Figure 1 is an image from the Wikipedia by Colegota showing a one week old Panda in 2005 at the Chengdu’s Giant Panda Breeding Research Base in China.  What more can I say but
AWWW!
Figure 1 - 1 week old giant panda cub.  Image from the Wikipedia by Colegota and in the public domain under common attribution license.

Figure 1 – 1 week old giant panda cub at Chendu’s Giant Panda Breeding Research Base in China . Image from the Wikipedia by Colegota and in the public domain under common attribution license.

 

Pareidolia of the hand of God

 NASA's Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, or NuSTAR, has imaged the structure in high-energy X-rays for the first time, shown in blue. Lower-energy X-ray light previously detected by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory is shown in green and red. Nicknamed the "Hand of God," this object is called a pulsar wind nebula. It's powered by the leftover, dense core of a star that blew up in a supernova explosion. The stellar corpse, called PSR B1509-58, or B1509 for short, is a pulsar: it rapidly spins around, seven times per second, firing out a particle wind into the material around it -- material that was ejected in the star's explosion. These particles are interacting with magnetic fields around the material, causing it to glow with X-rays. The result is a cloud that, in previous images, looked like an open hand. The pulsar itself can't be seen in this picture, but is located near the bright white spot.

Figure 1 – The “Hand of God Nebula” image taken by NASA’s  Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array.  From NASA and in the public domain.

When I was in Junior High School, we were encouraged to read a little book called “How to Build a Better Vocabulary.”  This was actually quite an amusing book that in part taught through cartoons. Each chapter began with a cartoon.  I had two favorites.  The first was an ancient Roman ice skater in toga trying to complete a perfect figure VIII.  The second was a little boy talking excitedly to his mother.  “Mommy, mommy, I learned a new word today.  Can you surmise what it is?  I’ll give you three surmises.”  Well the word for today is “pareidolia.

According to the Wikipedia: Pareidolia (/pærɨˈdoʊliə/ parr-i-DOH-lee-ə) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant, a form of apophenia. Common examples include seeing images of animals or faces in clouds, the man in the moon or the Moon rabbit, and hearing hidden messages on records when played in reverse.”

Oh, hell! Now I have to look up apophenia.  Again Wiki to the rescue: “Apophenia /æpɵˈfiːniə/ is the experience of seeing patterns or connections in random or meaningless data. The term is attributed to Klaus Conrad by Peter Brugger, who defined it as the “unmotivated seeing of connections” accompanied by a “specific experience of an abnormal meaningfulness”, but it has come to represent the human tendency to seek patterns in random information in general, such as with gambling and paranormal phenomena.”

Now we’re getting somewhere.  Well maybe.  OK; so stick with me.  Man in the moon, Moon rabbit, objects and faces in clouds, those we can understand.  Then there’s the famous “Virgin Mary on a toasted cheese sandwich.”  In 2004, when it was already ten years old, it sold on Ebay for $28,000.  My personal favorite is “The face of Mother Teressa on a cinnamon bun.”  I can see the face, but it looks more like a smurf to me.

These food pareidolia remind me of a story that one of my colleagues told me when I was in graduate school.  He was late for work one day because his young son had thrown a fit over breakfast.  The lad had decided that his pancake looked like a giraffe and when mom decapitated the supposed giraffe, all hell broke loose.  I asked if the flapjack did indeed resemble a giraffe and my friend said: “not really.”  Therein lies the difference between adults and children, I guess.  We don’t all construct the same associations. The pareidolia is, of course, the firm basis of the Rorschach or inkblot test.

NASA recently released the ultimate pareidolia from its high energy X-ray satellite, NuSTAR, (see Figure 1 blue). Lower-energy X-ray light previously detected by NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory is added and shown in green and red.  This object has been nicknamed the “Hand of God,” and it is technically a pulsar wind nebula, powered by the leftover, dense core of a star that blew up in a supernova explosion. The stellar corpse, called PSR B1509-58, or B1509 for short, is a pulsar: it rapidly spins around, seven times per second, firing out a particle wind into the material around it — material that was ejected in the star’s explosion. These particles are interacting with magnetic fields around the material, causing it to glow with X-rays.

It does look like a hand or “The Hand of God.”  It is highly reminiscent of the nebulous hand that holds captive the Star Ship Enterprise in the first Star Trek series episode “Who mourns for Adonais.”

Such 3D pareidolia are interesting because the probably do not retain their cohesiveness in terms of what we see as you move around them.  Which in this case, of course, we cannot do.

I am personally quite sensitive to these associations.  I am forever seeing faces in the folds of drapes and clothing.  Also I have been informally been working for several years on a photoessay that I refer to as “The Quest for the Ents,” taking pictures of faces in trees.  The most successful, an image of a venerable sycamore, is shown in Figure 2 and was taken several years ago in Central  Park in New York City.

Perhaps the sweetest of pareidolia is contained in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, when (IV.5) Ophelia says: “There’s pansies, that’s for thoughts.” The name pansy is derived from the French word pensée “thought”, and if you look closely and, perhaps squint just a bit, you will see a little pensive, perhaps lion-like, face in the pansy flower.

Figure 2 - "Old Tree-man" (c) DE Wolf 2012.

Figure 2 – “Old Tree-man” (c) DE Wolf 2012.

In the decisive moment – and one way of dealing with the cold

Figure 1 - A decisive moment on the beach in La Paloma, Rocha, Uruguary. (c) L Algorta and used with permission.

Figure 1 – A decisive moment on the beach in La Paloma, Rocha, Uruguary. (c) L Algorta 2014 and used with permission.

As I have mentioned a few times, it has been mighty cold here in the Northeast.  There are many ways to deal with this.  You can be like Mr. Zakowski of yesterday’s post and go out and deal with it, taking beautiful photographs.  You can be like me and stay indoors as much as possible.  Bring on the macrophotography!  My friend and Hati and Skoll reader, Lucia, has been even more creative.  She went to visit family in Uruguay, which is to say that she chose summer over winter.  Smart girl!

About a week ago Lucia sent me the wonderful picture of Figure 1.  It was taken with her cell phone on the beach at La Paloma, Rocha, Uruguary just as a storm broke and then sun came out. Amazing!   It is the light of what Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908-2004) called a perfect “decisive moment.”  It doesn’t last.  You just have to take the picture.

In had that experience once on a bridge in Amsterdam, NL.  It is also, of course, the experience of Ansel Adams when he took “Moonrise, Hernandez, NM, 1941.”The result of my decisive Amsterdam moment is this image.  What I learned from that experience was that the process needs to be three-fold.  First have your camera ready and preset for the light.  That’s gotten a lot easier with all the auto features on modern cameras. But I still do it, because the light defines whether a picture is going to be possible. Second take the picture, just take it! Third, you can start to fuss with the compensation and exposure if the light remains long enough.

Back to Lucia’s picture.  There I was shivering at my desk on a rather gloomy and chilly morning.  What a treat to know that somewhere it was summer!

Frozen light house of Lake Michigan images by Thomas Zakowski.

Oh brrr!  It has been really cold here in the Northeast, so much so that I am wont to venture outside too much to take photographs.  Am missing a lot I know.  But when I look out at the Charles River frozen shore to shore in Watertown, I feel for the Canadian geese.

Well shame on me, a friend has brought to my attention a fabulous portfolio of pictures of lighthouses on Lake Michigan encased in ice.  Not just ice, but magical ice with wind twisted icicles.  This portfolio by Thomas Zakowski is spectacular and conjures up thoughts of the impending Fimbuvlter, when the wolf Skoll shall devour the sun and his brother Hati , the moon and the world will know no light. Mr. Zakowski is not afraid to venture out into the cold.

Enjoying his magical images by a warm fire while sipping hot chocolate sounds like an excellent way to spend a cold winter’s day.

The age of the drone comes to photography

Figure 1 - A photo drone positioned beside the moon.  Image from the Wikimedia Commons by Don McCullough and put into the public domain under creative commons attribution license.

Figure 1 – A photo drone positioned beside the moon. Image from the Wikimedia Commons by Don McCullough and put into the public domain under creative commons attribution license.

The Christmas holiday this year brought the news that Amazon was experimenting with drone delivery of packages.  While the big issue is bound to be safety to pedestrians, the age of the drone is coming and along with it the real possibility that you will be able to click the little “30 minute delivery” icon with your computer mouse and a half an hour later your package is delivered by one of Amazon’s “Octocopters.”

Some of the implications of this are, well, kind of chilling.  Technical advantage is fleeting and there  are lots of people out there with pretty nefarious motives.  So how this all plays out in terms of governmental control is going to be interesting to say the least.

Still from a amateur, or even professional, photographer’s perspective here is a whole new tool for photography and a whole new perspective on the world as well.  We have all seen the little helicopters being sold at the malls.  They go for about $30 and are good for scaring animals and breaking fragile things around the house.  One of the sights that amused me this past fall as I walked around the mall was a drone hot air balloon in the shape of a shark.  Children gathered on the second floor and giggled gleefully as this misplaced predator was guided from the ground floor tauntingly close to out stretched arms.

But there are some new products out there selling for about the price of a good digital camera that enable you to fly a camera around the neighborhood, hovering over trees, or you neighbor’s swimming pool.  Nude sunbathers beware!  Figure 1 shows a picture of one of these taken by California photographer Don McCullough.  He asked the operator to move it in position with the moon.

For those of you interested in exploring this technology further, a review of the latest version of this technology, the Phantom 2 Vision Photo Drone from DJI can be found in the NY Times.  This retails for about $1200.  The conclusion there is that it’s not a toy, or at least that it’s a toy for big boys and girls.  Also the camera suffers from  wide angle pin cushioning.  But maybe that’s the effect that you’re looking for as you zoom about the landscape.

Seriously though, what we are probably witnessing is the early stages of a whole new perspective for photographers.  You will no longer be limited by where you can carry your camera.  The sky’s the limit!

Follow-up on “Follow me”

Last March I posted about Murad Osmann and his Instagram sensation “Follow-me.”  Osmann has taken a truly rare perspective, focusing on the back of his girlfriend Nataly Zakharova as she leads him all around the world.  Each picture is shot from the photographer, or observer’s viewpoint, and you see Nataly’s hand as she reaches back and leads Osmann onto adventure in some dramatic world. He takes these pictures either with his IPhone or with his DSLR and then uses Camera+ software for processing.

Well, throughout the year this photoseries and mystery has gone viral, as they say.  There are thousands of fans following Murad and Nataly on their journeys.  But Nataly never turns her face.  That is until now, when she turned it for NBC’s “Today Show.”  Murad’s muse is finally revealed.  Both Murad and the newly revealed Nataly both informed us, they do it for love.

One more tilt of the hat for the New Year

I know that I should be giving up on the New Year by this point.  It’s old news and time to move on.  Still I found myself this past weekend checking out BBC News’ “Best Reader Photographs of 2013.”  So I am hoping that you will excuse me one more trip down the memory lane that was 2013.

One of the nice things about that BBC is that they feature readers’ photos.  So it’s not just about professional photographers from this and that news agency.  I was amazed at how many pictures from this past year’s BBC series I loved, that is even if i exclude the cute cuddly animal photos.

My top like from BBC 2013 is Samina Farooq’s “Puzzles and Riddles.”  I like the dramatic colors, the gesture of the hands, the enigmatic numbers on the fingers, and the black background.  It all brings new life to the Rubick’s Cube.

Then there is the wonderful photo by Manisha on the theme of “Hands.” This is a very well done and excellently composed example of perspective shift and ambiguity.  The transfer from the two size reference frames is seemless.  And I think that the floor tiles and the stairs really add to the drama of the photograph.  Placing them diagonally in the image adds a very dramatic effect that I do not believe would be there if they were pependicular or parallel to the image.  The complement the theme.

Next there is Alan Walker’s “Just a pink hat on a sunny day – to take your mind off winter.”  Frankly, I really need this about now!  It is truly freezing here.  I just love the way that the lip gloss matches the hat and the little sparkles of sunlight on the woman’s face.

I’d like to also mention the Zara Sumpton’s “A frame within a frame A self portrait taken with a disposable camera in the jungle, Ecuador.”   A hypocrite would also mention the kitten peering over the edge of a table in N Sishat’s “My kitten Prof. Piddles eavesdropping on a private conversation between my husband and me.” But, of course, I will not!

Whither the Tralfamadorians?

Figure 1 - Tardis time machine from the English television series "Dr. Who."  From the Wikimediacommons, upload by Zir, and put in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Tardis time machine from the English television series “Dr. Who.” From the Wikimediacommons, uploaded by Zir, and put in the public domain.

Well, I regret to inform everyone that no one sent me an email response to yesterday’s post before it was posted: no Dr.Who, no Petula Clark or Billy Pilgrim, no Tralfamadorian.  Not even the Time Traveler’s Wife bothered to respond ahead of time.  It was a bust and rather disappointing.

I am not ready, however, to rule out time travel based on this little experiment.  There are three possible reasons why no time traveler responded: 1. there are no time travelers, 2 no time traveler saw my post, and 3. no time traveler reads hatiandskoll.com or cares to communicate with us.

Do not discount the last of these.  Time travelers, in literature at least, are a rather apathetic group.  If you think about it, a major component of human endeavor is to change things to “build a life for oneself,” or “to make a better life for one’s children,” as examples.Your goal is to change or make the future. When you are “unstuck in time” as for instance Kurt Vonnegut‘s Billy Pilgrim, you kinda lose that motivation.  Nothing matters; because you always know what is going to happen – you become truly indifferent.

In our world religions the question of knowing and not knowing the future is akin to the question of preordination.  You do not want to become complacent and indifferent.  We have, for instance, Matthew 24.2 “Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.” And in religions were predeterminism is dominant, little “catch twenty-twos” tend to evolve.

You may have heard the arguments that when a supposed time traveler travels through time, (s)he is really traveling between alternative universes.  Such a concept solves a lot of the paradoxes of time travel.  For instance, if you go back and kill your grandfather you essentially limit the number of these universes that you can be in.  Although like Hilbert’s “Grand Infinite Hotel” there are still an infinite number of universes available to you. Albeit, fewer than the infinite possibilities that there were before.  I hope that’s clear! Then, of course, there is the question of what happens when two of these rooms are home to Dr. Spock, one young one old.

That concept seems to work quite well on a quantum level.  For bulkier sentient beings, such as ourselves, the argument of parallel universes seems a bit lame.  But who knows?

I remain a bit saddened that I received no comments about yesterday’s post until it appeared, which was after all the expected result.  I did breathe just a bit harder the moments before the deadline.  Such a message would truly have been rather unsettling.  And there is something reassuring about not knowing what is going to happen next.

Then there is the quote from Canadian mycologist Arthur Henry Reginald Buller (1874-1944) in Punch (December 19, 1923).

“There was a young lady named Bright,
Whose speed was far faster than light;
She started one day
In a relative way,
And returned on the previous night.”