Roman Vishniac, “The only flowers of her youth, 1938″ Favorite Photographs for 2013, #1

I’d like to begin this year’s list of favorite photographs with Roman Vishniac’s (1897-1990) photograph “The Only Flowers of Her Youth, Warsaw, 1938.“  Vishniac photographically documented the lives of Jews in Eastern Europe on the verge of the holocaust.  Many of these were assembled in his 1983 book “A Vanished World.” The story associated with this picture is that the little girl depicted was confined to her bed all winter because she had no shoes. She was kept company only by the flowers on her wall, which were painted  painted by her father who was an artist.  And these flowers were the only ones that she had ever seen.  Today Roman Vishniac, a Russian American photographer is best known for his work on shtetl life.  However, he later in life turned, actually returned, his attention to his first great passion biology and photomicroscopy.

 

The archives of Vishniac’ work is at the International Center for Photography in New York City.  The archives are significant because they enable viewers to see not only the works that Vishniac chose to publish in his book but all of them.  The world of the Jews in Eastern Europe was complex. like that of all societies.

As the rest of the twentieth century unfolded and now the twenty-first begins to unfold, we are struck by a fundamental sadness.  We had hoped that the end of World War II would bring the end of world genocide.  But this was not the case. The little girl in the picture becomes a kind of “poster child” for all these victims.  She speaks to us of universal despair.

On a photographic level “The only flowers of her youth” resonates with to this despair.  We see her face, take note of her surroundings, and we know that there is something wrong.  By now we have seen enough images to immediately recognize and relate to them.  But, and I think this important, we need the title or caption to really and fully understand it.  I have come to realize that there are two types of great portraits: those that need no context and those that do.  This is a powerful and moving example of the second type.

 

Ten favorite photographs for 2013

Last year at this time I started to post a series of blogs and images that I entitled “Ten favorite photographs.”  I’d like to continue that tradition.  So starting today and then each day until the end of the year, I am going to present ten of my favorite photographs, one each day.  It is my holiday gift to you, or maybe to myself, because each time I revisit a crowning work by one of the great photographers it is a special and inspiring moment.  It is a moment to relearn the power of image.

So just a few rules of the game.

  1. I am only allowed one image per photographer.  I have to choose.
  2. I have to respect copyrights.  This means that most of the time you are going to have to click on the title to see the image.
  3. I’m allowed to talk about photographers that I have previously discussed in this blog, but I’m not allowed to repost a picture from last year’s list..
  4. I’m not going to try to order the images on a scale of one to ten, except perhaps the last.  They’re pretty much in random order.

There are two points that I find interesting about the process.  First, my list from last year stands.  These are still my top ten favorites.  But second, there is a world of fabulous images and these enrich our lives every day.  They make us laugh and they make us cry, but most of all “they give us pause.”This is because they evoke what is fundamentally common and therefore human inside us.  Such is truly the magic of photography.

I very much hope that you enjoy these photographs and I invite you to send a link to your favorites for possible inclusion on the blog.

Three wonderful pictures from this past week

As regular readers of this blog know, every week I scour the “Best Photos of the Week” features from various sources in search of cool images.  Sometimes I find one that really moves me and sometimes I don’t.  The latter is like the fantasy of the newscasters rather than giving you the grim and gruesome events of the past week simply going on the air and say: “absolutely nothing happened this week.” They always find something.  Don’t they?

Well this week on the NBC News site alone I found three really wonderful photographs.  Each is appealing for different reasons.

The first is from South Africa by Yannis Behrakis / Reuters an shows a boy named Anda, looking out from his window during the burial of Nelson Mandela in Quanu, SA on December 15.  What is striking here is the juxtaposition of the cloud at times giving him a chewbacca hairstyle and at other times appearing to eminate as a breath from his mouth, just like the old North Wind.  When I say at times, I am referring to the way your mind flips between the details and this gives a photograph a sense of motion a dynamic intensity.  So great composition kudos to Yannis Behrakis, and of course, there is also this wonderful sense of the present coming face-to-face with the reflection of the past which transcends the otherwise simple fun of the picture.

The second is by Omer Saleem / EPA and magnificently shows thick fog covering a highway in Lahore, Pakistan, on December 17.  Sadly at least 11 people were killed and 67 injured overnight in Punjab province due to highway accidents.  This fits in well with the London and Grand Canyon fog pictures that I spoke about last Sunday.

Finally, and just for the sheer delight of the image is Arnd Wiegmann / Reuters photograph of a couple skating on the crystalline, glistening surface of Lake St. Moritz in Switzerland on December 14.  From the looks of it the man has been spinning the woman in a circle.  The circle needless -to-say is symbolic of a love bond.  So in a sense this image also transcends itself – in this case its own simple beauty.

 

 

 

Photographic numerology – what is the best ratio aspect for an image

Figure 1 - Early English Pence of Aethelred the Unready.  The reverse bears a cross which made it convenient to divide the coin in halfpence or quarther pence referred to as farthings.  Image from Arichis uploaded to the Wikipedia and placed in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Early English Pence of Aethelred the Unready*. The reverse bears a cross which made it convenient to divide the coin in halfpence or quarther pence referred to as farthings. Image from Arichis uploaded to the Wikipedia and placed in the public domain.

The other day I had gone out to take photographs in New York City and I found myself snapping away merrily – ’tis the season for merry!  When I got home, I was curious how many photos I had taken and found that the number was 36.  One roll, I thought to myself.  In the good old days(?) 35 mm roll film used to come in 24 exposure and 36 exposure rolls.  This is like a base twelve system of some sort and smacks of either a Babylonian (twelve sixty minute hours to the half day (sunrise to sunset) or old English (12 inches to the foot, 36 inches to the yard, twelve pence to the shilling, and twenty shillings or 240 pence to the pound) conspiracy.  By the way at 36 mm x 26mm, 35 mm film wasn’t even 35 mm, which is another mystery.

Hmm, it’s all very strange and, of course, the reason that film is the way it is results from some historical vagaries.  But it is not the only numerological oddity in photography.  Why is the favorite aspect ratio today 6 x 4? 6/4 = 1.67.  What about full frame 35 mm that’s 36/26 =  1.38.  Think about the common paper sizes from when 35 mm film ruled. 8 x 10 gives us 1.25 as does 16 x 20.  11 x 14 gives us 1.27.  All of these are very similar and almost compatible with 35 mm film, just a wee bit of cropping. But 5 x 7 gives us 1.4.

There is however, something really interesting about all of this.  I try to standardize my aspect ration and only rarely go to a random freehand aspect ratio.  But I typically find that 8 x 10 doesn’t feel quite right, nor does 5 x 7.  What’s magical about 6 x 4?

The answer is, perhaps obvious.  1.67 is very close to the golden proportion or 1.6180339887.   We have discussed this before.  This proportion, as sides of a rectangle, was discovered by the ancient Greeks to be the most aesthetically pleasing.  It often occurs in nature and the Greeks and later artists used and use it widely, for instance in defining the proportions of the Parthenon.   It is also manifest in the approximation referred to as the Golden Rule of Thirds, which we have also discussed.  All of this, is food for thought on a rather cold day.  If it gets colder, I might just look into the details of the roll film sizes.

*Æthelred the Unready was king of England (978–1013 and 1014–1016).  Unready” is a mistranslation of Old English unræd (meaning bad-counsel)—a twist on his name “Æthelred”, meaning noble-counsel. A better translation would be ill-advised.

Nemo on Wheaties

Figure 1 - Domique Martinez's Nemo on Wheaties, Tampa, FL, (c) DE Wolf 2013.

Figure 1 – Domique Martinez’s Nemo on Wheaties, Tampa, FL, (c) DE Wolf 2013.

I wanted to share one more photograph from my recent trip to Tampa, Florida. This (see Figure 1) is a photograph of Dominique Martinez’s marvelous sculpture “Nemo on Wheaties.”  Nemo in this case is an angler fish – in fact a rather scary looking angler fish.  He captures the sunlight in many ways, but most particularly in his shiney convex eyes that invariably place a diminutive photographer in the picture.

What is probably most appealing to me about Nemo on Wheaties is that he reminds me of a book that I used to read to my son when he was small entitled Big Al.  Big Al was the ugliest fish in the sea, and as a result none of the other fish wanted to associate with him.  But in the end Big Al saved the day by rescuing all the other fish from become dinner. I loved Big Al.

Love at the barricades

I was really struck and haunted this week by a moving image by Viktor Drachev from AFP/Getty Images showing a young couple in front of the barricades in Kiev, Ukraine.  The image evokes the story of Eponine and Marius in Victor Hugo Les Miserables, or more specifically the musical by that name.  I really think that the image speaks for itself on so many levels.  It could just as easily be from the 1848 Paris Insurrection as  today’s Ukrainian Protests.  And for that it is a highly successful photograph.

A hotel mirror

Figure 1 - Dusk in my hotel mirror, Tampa Bay, FL. (c) DE Wolf 2013

Figure 1 – Dusk in my hotel mirror, Tampa Bay, FL. (c) DE Wolf 2013

At dusk today I was working on my laptop in my hotel bedroom.  The lights were turned off since I had been enjoying the pastels of the waning day. When I looked up the last light was shining in the huge silver framed mirror above the desk.  It acted as a perfect frame of the sheer curtains and the sky outside the window.

It seemed the perfect opportunity for a photograph; so I grabbed my camera and was dismayed to see just how low the light was.  I set the camera for ISO 6400 and aperture priority.  Even so  the exposure with my EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM was 1/13th of a second at f/5.0 working at 44 mm.  I had heard that you can do this handheld with an IS lens, but I had never tried it before.  So it represented a real test of the IS system.  The result, which I deem a success,  is shown in Figure 1.

In my mind it was a black and white from the start.  You can see the graininess from the ISO 6400.  But for an old Tri X Pan guy like me this is actually pleasing. I gave it a slight cold tone to the mid range and warm yellow to the highlights.  It is rare that I cold tone, but in this case I like the results.

Tampa Bay winter sunrise

Figure 1 - Tampa Bay Sunrise. December 14, 2013,. (c) DE Wolf 2013.

Figure 1 – Tampa Bay Sunrise. December 14, 2013,. (c) DE Wolf 2013.

As a New Englander I always find it strange to travel to some warm place in winter.  Provided that you stay in the Northern hemisphere there seems to be something peculiar going on.  It’s a lot warmer, but just as dark.  The sun still hangs relatively low in the sky and there is still a foreboding sense of winter.

This week I found myself… Wait that’s a silly way to put it, I got on an airplane and arrived in Tampa.  While my wife dealt with the first big snow of winter 2013/14, I was in sunshine.  This btw did not make me popular with my wife.  Also the city of Tampa found it necessary to spray some kind of artificial snow all over the place.  Whatever it was didn’t fool me and burned my eyes.

Still these are the shortest days of the year – even in Florida.  I offer up Figure 1 we shows the winter sun trying to rise over Tampa Bay shrouded in clouds.  This was a tough picture to work up and, I think, not totally successful.  Still Ibelieve that it conveys the feeling of the morning.  The sun cracks both the horizon and the clouds.  Look closely an you will see a blow-up Santa leaning over the balcony on the building in the foreground.

Adding dramatic effect to landscapes with fog

Figure 1 - The Grand Canyon filled with fog on November 29, 2013 by Erin Whitaker via the US NPS and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – The Grand Canyon filled with fog on November 29, 2013 by Erin Whitaker via the US NPS and in the public domain.

A lot of times a mundane or hackneyed landscape can be turned into a dramatic one with the addition of a little fog.  This week in pictures brought two absolutely stunning  examples.  The first comes from the London Metropolitan police via Reuters and shows the skyscrapers of London’s Canary Wharf district dramatically climbing above a fog enshrounded city on December 11, 2013. The second is taken on November 29, 2013 by Erin Whitaker via the United States National Park Service and shows the rare event due to a thermal inversion of a fog filled Grand Canyon.  It is shown here as Figure 1.