Summer Gardens in New England

[slideshow_deploy id=’3404’]

We have reached the beginning of August in New England, and the gardens are all marvelously ablaze with color.  Last weekend my dear friend and reader, Eleanor invited my wife and I to see her garden at the height of its glory.  Eleanor’s garden is filled with the most beautiful lilies imaginable, some of them with a breathtaking lavender hue, that I just love.  Dragon flies and hummingbirds are everywhere (my cat was not invited).  And what made it all very special was the fine mist of water droplets that covered everything with a fresh sense of expectant vitality.

Inspired we went this weekend to a fair that was being held at Elm Bank Reservation in Wellesley, Massachusetts, which is owned by the Massachusetts Horticultural Society.  There I photographed: bees on pink cone flowers, hibiscus, and flowering grasses.  I decided to experiment in this post with a little slide show of my flower work. Note, that if you place your mouse over the picture the title comes up.

Flower photography seems trivial because of power of color to delight our senses.  It is in fact a tricky task.  Finding just the right focus (best done in manual mode) and depth of field is an art.  It is really best done with a tripod and a macrolens.  But while not perfectly successful, I amused myself and got some acceptable if not brilliant images.  I believe that if you’re concentrating on the task at hand and deliberate in your work, you can learn a lot.

So again the end of August and the dog days are near.  I begin to get a bit wistful.  The school traffic will be back soon, and my commute will lengthen.  But the really nice point about New England is that the scene is always changing and the view is ever beautiful.

Evoking a sense of smell

Figure 1 - Astronaut Karen Nyberg on the International savoring the gift of a grapefruit from Earth.  From NASA and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Astronaut Karen Nyberg on the International Space Station savoring the gift of a grapefruit from Earth. From NASA and in the public domain.

It has always struck me as pretty wonderful how many of our memories instantly evoke a sense of smell.  My grandmother had this aluminum serving dish shaped like a flower.  When you pushed down on it the petals opened to reveal these wonderful after dinner mints.  To this day I cannot see a picture of my grandmother without the sense of a peppermint. And I can still smell Sunday dinners at my mother’s home.

Despite the fact that the olfactory is not our dominant sense by any means, it is striking to me how strong these image-smell associations can be.  So I offer today this absolutely wonderful picture from July 28 of NASA Astronaut Karen Nyberg aboard the International Space Station smelling a grapefruit sent up from the Blue Marble.

Back in colonial times, oranges were considered a rare delicacy, suitable for gift giving at Christmas time.  So among its many meanings the image of Figure 1 is a reminder of the precious things that we give up when we leave the bonds of Earth to meet our destiny in space.

Nitrocellulose-based flim

Figure 1 - a badly deteriorated piece of nitrocellulose photographic film, from the Library and Archives Canada / Bibliothèque et Archives Canada via the Wikipedia and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – a badly deteriorated piece of nitrocellulose photographic film, from the Library and Archives Canada / Bibliothèque et Archives Canada via the Wikipedia and in the public domain.

So, as promised, what about this nitrocellulose?  We really need to project ourselves back to the late nineteenth century and imagine that we want to create a light weight portable film that doesn’t require loading a single glass plate at a time.  Our goal, really George Eastman’s goal, was to create a flexible roll film. Nobody wanted to carry glass plates around.  So you need a tough, clear,sheet material, and its being the late nineteenth century there aren’t too many choices.

The story really begins in 1832 with Henri Braconnot, who used nitric acid combined with starch or wood fibers to produce a lightweight combustible explosive material to which he gave the name xyloïdine.  1832?, you exclaim, that’s just before photography was invented.  Then in 1838 Théophile-Jules Pelouze treated paper and cardboard in a similar manner to create nitramidine. Both of these were pretty unstable and not practical explosives. In 1846 Christian Friedrich Schönbein, finally found a practical solution.  He mixed nitric acid with cotton, dried the material, and then there was a flash.  Oh did I mention that he dried it on the oven door?   I am reminded of a childhood limerick:

“Johny was a chemist.

A chemist he is no more.

For what he thought was H20 was H2SO4.

And it rained little Johny for a week!”

Schönbein and several other chemists worked on controlling the process, which eventually led to the creation of a material called “gun cotton.”  Gun cotton was a usable explosive and was employed for all the good and bad uses you can imagine.

It was subsequently discovered that a suitable “plastic” (meaning flexible) sheet of Nitrocellulose could be made using camphor as a plasticizer.  Starting in 1889, Eastman Kodak, starting in August 1889 used as the first flexible film base.It was used until 1933 for X-ray films and for motion picture film until 1951.

Though driven by the technical requirements of a clear and flexible film base, using a material also used for magicians’ flash paper and explosives, was not ideal – especially when used in conjunction with very bright and very hot movie projectors.  Even worse, nitrocellulose, once burning, produces its own oxygen and as a result will continue to burn even when fully submerged in water. Projection rooms had to be lined with asbestos, and it was illegal to transport nitrocellulose movie films on the London underground.

Needless-to-say there were multiple fires caused by nitrocellulose movie film.  In 1926 a cinema fire at Dromcolliher in County Limerick claimed the lives of forty-eight people. Sixty-nine children where killed in a theatre in Paisley, Scotland in 1929.

And then you have the coup de grace.  The intrinsic instability of nitrocellulose, the very thing that makes it useful as an explosive, makes it a disaster from an archival point of view.  It deteriorates very badly (see Figure 1).  As a result old films, indeed the very films that represent the incunabula of cinema, are decaying.  They are dangerous to store, dangerous to work with, and crumbling to explosive nothingness!

Restoration of “Les Enfants du Paradis”

Figure 1 - Scene from Les Infants du Paradis, from the French Wikipedia and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Scene from Les Infants du Paradis, from the French Wikipedia and in the public domain.

I was reading the BBC news “Pictures of the Day” yesterday and came upon an intriguing photograph of a technician restoring the 1945 French film “Les Enfants du Paradis,” (“Children of Paradise“) at the laboratory of Eclair outside Paris.  The film shot on nitrocellulose was seriously compromised and constantly in danger of exploding or bursting into flames – never a good thing!  The film was directed by Marcel Carné during the German occupation of France during World War II. The plot is prototypic.  Set in the Parisian theatre scene of the 1820s and 30s, it tells of a needless-to-say beautiful courtesan named Garance, and the four men who love her: a mime artist, an actor, a criminal, and an aristocrat.

The accolades for this film are astounding.  In the original American trailer it was described as the French answer to “Gone With the Wind” .  None other than the great French film director François Truffaut  said: “‘I would give up all my films to have directed Children of Paradise’”  TAnd here’s the clincher, in 1995, it was voted “Best Film Ever” in a poll of 600 French critics and film professionals.

So, the restoration is an important landmark in the history of film conservation.  Now we get to see it as it was meant to be seen. It is also a tribute to the incredible painstaking work associated with such a frame by frame.  It is truly a work of love, and to someone, like myself, who was involved in some of the early image processing, our ability to accomplish such Herculean tasks is, frankly, awe inspiring!

But it all begs the questions: what is this thing called nitrocellulose and why would anyone use an explosive as a film base?  I’d like to explore these mysteries in tomorrow’s blog.

E. E. McCollum and the “Cocoon Series”

Phew!  It had been a very busy and stressful week.  So this past Saturday morning, in the peaceful early hours, I found myself looking for something soul-soothing and I found it on the pages of LensWork online in E. E. McCollum’s “Cocoon Series.”  Of course, I immediately visited McCollum’s own site and found many more wonderful images.

The cocoon series began when McCollum’s friend and model Kaitlin went into the dressing room of his studio, donned a nylon body cocoon, and began posing in it.  The effect is arresting.  The cocoon creates: first a sense of mystery, second its own marvelous forms, and third some of the most gorgeous ripple textures imaginable.  I just love these wave patterns.  To me, as a scientist, they are suggestive of what are called space time warps.  In physics, these gravity patterns represent being.  Every object or person creates a warp in space time that affects all other object or persons.

Of course, the cocoon represents transformation – the fundamental transformation between caterpillar and butterfly.  It is death and then it is resurrection to something much more beautiful.  It has that fundamental ambiguity of meaning about it and therein lies the great mystery.

I keep trying to figure out which image in “The Cocoon Series” is my favorite, and that is very hard.  Maybe it is #41, which I love for its photographic and compositional qualities.  But then there is #34 which is so beautiful because of its simplicity and its sense of beauty emergent.

I also think that McCollum’s “Dance” series holds many gems.  I am struck by the figures in motion leaping through the air.  It is curious, when there is a single figure captured in motion its kind of “OK that is cool!”  But when there are two figures, such as “Greenfield #2,” it all becomes just magical and balance.  It defies gravity,

This is a website that I plan on returning to.  And it offered up a wonderful start to a weekend.

 

So ugly only a mother could love

I think that we need a break from memes and myths and themes.  So I thought that it would be a good day for confessions.  Like everyone else, I cannot resist a cute and touching animal picture.  This one is for reader Wendy S.  It’s from the AP and was taken on July 24 and shows an Indian parrot hatchling being fed by hand.  It had been caught in a forest in the northeastern Indian state of Nagaland by a local hunter and offered for sale . It shows a mythic bond and relationship between species…  Sorry, maybe I should just say: “Aww!”

Tunnel imagery

Figure 1 - Painting of a horse from the great cave at Lascoux. From the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Painting of a horse from the great cave at Lascoux. From the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain.

On July 20th, I blogged about the photographs of Beth Yarnelle Edwards, and I went on a bit about an image named Friedo that shows a little boy running madly through a long white tunnel, and I said at the time: “This is one of those great recurrent mythic themes, the long passageway of birth, moving towards the light, or perhaps it is the rebirth that some primitive cultures create as a rite of liminal passage,  It shows the great joy of youthful motion and is symbolic as much as it is literal.”  I have been more than a bit concerned that you might, as a result of this statement, think that I have taken some kind of Freudian pill or at the very least that I am myself quite mad.  It’s partly because of this that I have introduced the mythic context as a way of looking at photographs.

For the last year, we have been talking about photographs fairly randomly.  But if you think about it or are keeping score, you are going to realize that tunnels keep cropping up.  Besides little Friedo we have Abelardo Morell’s rabbit going down the rabbit hole in his Alice in Wonderland portfolio, the tunnel through the woods in our discussion of surreal images, Peter Gedeis’ journeys to the center of the Earth, photographs of construction of the Second Avenue Subway in NYC, and even Timothy O’Sullivan’s magnesium powder photograph taken deep in a mine on the Comstock Lode.  The bottom line is that tunnels are everywhere, consciously or subconsciously.

Think about the earliest pictures that we have.  Figure 1 is an example –  petroglyphs from the great cave at Lascoux in France.  This was not a walk in the park but it was exquisitely spiritually profound.  You had to crawl on your belly through narrow passageways carrying torches.  But when you reached the cave the world was suddenly and miraculously transformed.  The flickering torchlight made the drawings come to life and dance on the walls.  You had achieved a mythic plane.

Call it what you want: myth, meme, or recurrent theme. This is what tunnels mean and do.  They transform you from where you are to a magic place, to a higher and sometimes a lower place.  Beowolf descends into Grendel’s cave to do battle with him.  Bilbo Baggins follows to battle dragons and Gollum.  Alice descends down the rabbit hole to “Wonderland.”  Dorothy descends up the tunnel like vortex to Oz and the Emerald City.  The list is pretty much endless.  Indeed, in classical mythology and literature there are so many gods and mortals like Irana, Orpheus, Odysseus, Persephone, and Dante descending into the underworld that you start to worry about a traffic jam.  The point is that when you see a tunnel in a photography think magic, transformation, and passage.  You’ll never be too far off target.

Figure 2. - Picture from the tunnel between Rigshospitalet (National Hospital) in Copenhagen and Amagerværket (Amager Powerplant) in Amager. The tunnel transfers heated water and steam for the city. Photograph by Bill Ebbesen, from the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain under creative commons license.

Figure 2 – Picture from the tunnel between Rigshospitalet (National Hospital) in Copenhagen and Amagerværket (Amager Powerplant) in Amager. The tunnel transfers heated water and steam for the city. Photograph by Bill Ebbesen, from the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain under creative commons license.

 

 

 

 

 

Something good to say about Barbie

I’ve done a lot of Barbie bashing in this blog, but I believe in giving credit where credit is due.  So please have a look at this image by Tytus Zmijewski of Landov*.  It speaks directly to our topic of yesterday – the concept of the fundamental nobility of human beings.  It was taken on July 19, 2013 and shows a little girl and cancer patient, Nikola Cichowczyk aged eight playing with one of the twelve bald Barbie dolls at Jurasz University Hospital in Bydgoszcz, Poland. This is the only place in Poland where children, who are recovering from chemotherapy, get to play with special bald, wig wearing Barbie dolls.  The Mattel Company created these bald dolls so that young patients, who have lost their hair as a result of cancer treatments can relate to the body image. These are unique dolls and are not for sale at retail stores.  I guess that it’s the other side of the coin, there ultimately being two sides to everything, and the Mattel Company deserves a lot of credit.

*I cannot resist commenting technically about Zmijewski’s photograph.  It is a powerful tool in portrait photography to not have your entire subject in focus.  Here the doll and wig are sharply in focus in the foreground, while little Nikola is clearly discernible, but not in focus, in the background. Notice, in fact how narrow the sharp focus is, only the doll and the wig are sharp; even Barbie’s feet are out of focus.  Zmijewski has chosen wisely for the subject matter, which demands this setup, but in general you can do it either way.  Note also that the perspective elongates the distance between the two, creating even greater interest.  Interest is further accentuated by the matching color of Barbie’s out fit and the little girl’s shirt.  So it’s not just a wonderful picture, but an expertly executed one as well.

Bruce Davidson, Jacob Riis, and John Thompson – contrasting visions

Figure 1 - Jacob Riis, "Bohemian Cigar Makers at work in their tenement, 1914" from the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Jacob Riis, “Bohemian cigar makers at work in their tenement, 1914” from the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain.

The concept of photography as a form of story telling, of creative mythology, is a useful one for interpretation of images.  A couple of days ago, I discussed the images of Bruce Davidson’s “East 100th Street” portfolio, and it is significant to contrast these with the work of Jacob Riis and John Thompson, which I have discussed previously.  They are all documentaries on poverty, yet they and their intrinsic messages are quite different.

In Davidson’s images the little stories that they evoke in our minds, that our minds create in reaction to them, contain the fundamental message that human beings are noble, that they live, love, and are capable of ultimate triumph over adversity.  In the case of Riis’ and Thompsons’ images the humanity and nobility are there, but the message is that these are almost squashed and completely beaten down.  It is a faint and almost muted voice. Thompson’s image “The Crawlers” touches not only on the mythic image of “noble mankind” but also and in the most disturbing manner on the mythic image of “madonna and child.”  It has all gone awry in a hideous way.

What my mind pulls up (again fishing a sea of mythic imagery) is the 1981 novel “The Hunger” by Whitley Strieber and the 1983 movie by the same name with Catherine Deneuve and David Bowie.  The vampire’s lovers become immortal, but in the end they become barely alive, faint, and muted.  I don’t know if many of you have read this story; but the effect of it is horrifying.  I guess that’s why it’s called a horror story. Well duh, Wolf!

The basic message of Riis and Thompson, is almost a Calvinist one – appropriate for the Victorian and Edwardian age.  It’s almost like these people are atoning for something, but we as good people must help them.  Davidson’s message is ultimately uplifting.  If anyone’s to blame, it’s society.

Perhaps, I’m reading a lot into this.  But the important point is that all three of these portfolios grab at us because we have a fundamental belief that human beings are noble beings deserving of, or fundamentally possessing, dignity.  The way in which that is portrayed is a function, as it always is, of the prevailing views of society then and now.