The Battle of the Somme

Figure 1 - The Tyneside Irish Brigade advancing on the first day of the Battle of the Somme, July 1, 1916. Taken by an official of the British government and in the public domain in the US and UK by virtue of its age.

Figure 1 – The Tyneside Irish Brigade advancing on the first day of the Battle of the Somme, July 1, 1916. Taken by an official of the British government and in the public domain in the US and UK by virtue of its age.

As we attempt to deal with “the unspeakable” in our own time, we are ever shadowed by the Great War that played out exactly a century ago. July 1, 1916 marked the start of the Battle of the Somme. Ultimately it lasted from July 1 to November 18, 1916 and was fought on both sides of the upper reaches of the River Somme in France. It was the largest battle of the First World War on the Western Front. More than one million men were wounded or killed, making it one of the bloodiest battles in human history. July 1, 1916 itself was the bloodiest day in British military history.

When the British went “over the top” they suffered 57,470 casualties. This was, greater than the total combined British casualties in the Crimean and Boer wars. At the end of the battle, British and French forces had pushed the Germans back by six miles. Indicative of the state of stalmate this was the largest gain in territory since the Battle of the Marne in 1914. Historian debate the role of the Somme in the ultimate Allied Victory.

There are many photographs that survive of this battle. Some are real and some were staged at the time to serve government propaganda and news purposes. Figure 1 shows a support company of the Tyneside Irish Brigade advancing from the Tara-Usna Line opposite La Boisselle on the first day of the battle. It was taken by a member of the Royal Engineers No 1 Printing Company. It’s fuzziness and back lighting create a feeling both of surrealism and age. It is reminiscent of Ingmar Bergman’s “Seventh Seal” and the “Dance of Death.” It seems a dim and distant memory or nightmare that still stands to haunt us asking the question both for now and then of “Why?” One point is terribly clear, our ability to photograph wars has certainly not brought them to an end.

Of club mosses, horsetails, and flash photography – or – lycophytes light up the sky

Figure 1 -Lycopodiella cernua. Image from the Wikimedia Commons original by Eric Guinther

Figure 1 -Lycopodiella cernua. Image from the Wikimedia Commons original by Eric Guinther distributed under a Creative Commons Share-Alike Attribution 4.0 International license.

Last night I was doing some reading about the lycophyta. This is a phylum of vascular plants. OK, don’t ask me why. It’s just that I am interested in all sorts of things. Figure 1 is an example of a lycophyte specially Lycopodiella cernua. If you walk along in forests, like I do, these kinds of plants are quite common. Indeed, that statement could be made for a very long time. The fossil record dates them back to the Devonian, 416 million to 358 million years ago.

You may at this point ask what this all has to do with photography and the thing is that in my taxonomy book I came across a cryptic statement that lycophyte spores were used in photography flash powder. This seemed a invaluable factoid and perked my love of the esoteric gene. So today I did some computer searching.

Lets see human uses of lycopodia abound. There are the usual uses in treating ailments such as urinary tract problems, diarrhea and other digestive tract problems, headaches, skin ailments, and the induction of labor. And, needless-to-say, in some cultures they were used as aphrodisiacs. Where would we be without that? And here’s the critical thing, the spores are also very flammable because of to their high oil content. As a result, they were used in Native American cultures for dramatic ceremonial purposes. The shamans would toss the spores into a fire for a flash of light. As a result, Lycopodium powder was used as a flash powder for photography. The dried spores of the common clubmoss, was similarly used in Victorian theater to produce flame-effects and in fireworks. A blown cloud of spores burned rapidly and brightly, but with little heat. It was considered safe by the standards of the time. Famous last words!

In the 19th century lycopodium powder was a common laboratory supply, The inventor of photography Nicéphore Niépce used lycopodium powder in the fuel for the first internal combustion engine, the Pyréolophore, in about 1807.  Chester Carlson used lycopodium powder in 1938 in his early experiments to demonstrate xerography, aka the precursor of today’s Xerox machine. Still not impressed? Take a look at this video.

“We live in a flash of light; evening comes and it is night forever.
It’s only a flash and we waste it.
We waste it with our anxiety, our worries, our concerns, our burdens.”

 

Jurassic Park among my hostas

Figure 1 - Juvenile wild turkey among my hostas. Sudbury, MA. (c) DE Wolf 2016.

Figure 1 – Juvenile wild turkey among my hostas. Sudbury, MA. (c) DE Wolf 2016.

Sometimes if you are really lucky Nature comes to you. This morning as I was pulling into my driveway, I discovered a young group of wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in my backyard. These are the most dinosaur looking of birds. So it was a scene of Jurassic Park among my hostas. I raced to retrieve my camera and chased this flock of fowls into the woods snapping away. Apparently, for wild turkeys, it’s a flock, for domestic turkeys, a gang. The lighting forced me into a suboptimum exposure time for the focal length I was using. But the image came out with decent sharpness and I love the iridescence of the birds neck. The first time that I say on of these guys up close I mistook it for a peacock. Probably this speaks more of my impressionability that the intrinsic quality of turkey plumage. People will call them ugly, but there is a certain beauty and elegance in what Ben Franklin proposed (well kinda sorta…) as the National Bird.

And happily there is an Ogden Nash poem about turkeys.

The Turkey

“There is nothing more perky

Than a masculine turkey.

When he struts he struts

With no ifs or buts.

When his face is apoplectic

His harem grows hectic,

And when he gobbles

Their universe wobbles.”

Canon T2i with EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens, ISO 1600, Aperture Priority AE Mode, 1/125th sec at f/7.1 with no exposure compensation.

Knocking down icons and raising flags

On the day following the historic Breixt vote in the United Kingdom, it seems that the world is ready to knock down icons of stability and throw caution to the wind. The regime of the EU evolved to maintain world economic order after the battles of World War II. So it seems quite appropriate that the greatest icon of that war fell, or at least was corrected, this week as well.

The United States Marine Corps acknowledged this week, seventy-one years after the event, that it had misidentified one of the Marines in Joe Rosenthal’s ironic flag raising image from Iwo Jima. The previously unknown Pfc. Harold Schultz of Detroit is the sixth man in the picture, service leaders confirmed.

This speaks to two things. First, is the tenuous state of information from that time compared to ours. And second, is the power of photography to capture, freeze the moment, and ultimately play witness to the facts.

Death of the Monster Polaroid

This past Sunday was Father’s Day, and I wanted to put up on Face Book some old pictures of my son and me. So I pulled out some old prints and scanned them into my computer. This is a very unsatisfactory experience.  What you wind up with is something pretty fuzzy and certainly not up to digital standards, I am coming to hate film. It is not that there is anything wrong or intrinsically unsharp about film photography. It is just that the way it was practiced was often mediocre, and the process of going from object to negative to print to scanner to computer is fraught with analog steps. Your picture is only as good as the camera lens, only as good as the enlarger lens, only as good as your scanner optics. So the digital life is good.

Still there are those that love film. And on Monday morning I read an article in the New York Times entitled “Champions of a Monster Polaroid Yield to the Digital World.”  Back in the 1970s Polaroid Corporation’s president Edwin H. Land had five behemoth Polaroid cameras built of wood. These cameras used gigantic 20” x 24” sheets of polaroid film. They sat upon hospital gurney wheels and weighed 200 lbs a piece. They were designed to demonstrate the quality of the company’s large-format film. But cameras were quickly adopted by artists like: Chuck Close and Robert Rauschenberg and photographers like William Wegman, David Levinthal and Mary Ellen Mark. They made instant images that had the size and presence of sculpture or of heroic oil paintings.  These, of course, harkened back to the days of very large format photography and at the time represented a great marriage between the high-tech and the antiquated.

In 2008, Polaroid filed for bankruptcy and stopped producing its instant film. However, former Polaroid engineer John Reuter put together an group of investors and bought up one of the original cameras and hundreds of cases of the original film. He formed  the 20×24 Studio. The plan was to reinvigorate the manufacture, but demand was not there and the materials have a finite lifetime. The company will close by the end of the year, and with it will fall yet another photographic art form.

I will not comment about whether this is only the first death kneel of film in photography. Chuck Close commented that “I haven’t given up… Here’s yet another medium that will be lost to history, and it just shouldn’t be allowed to happen. If it does, I don’t know what I’m going to do, to tell you the truth. It’s so integrated into everything I do. I can always imagine what making a painting from one of those pictures will look like.”

What is most interesting to me is that the forms to disappear irrevocably are the ones that require sophisticated manufacture or processing – the high tech ones. You can make your own dry plates, collodion plates, albumin paper, platinum palladium prints, even daguerreotypes. But when it comes to roll film, especially color with its complex demanding processing and really all bets are off. I think that it would be wonderful to create today autochrome, not digital mockeries but the bona fide thing. It might even be doable with a lot of dedication and hard work.

So it seemed as I struggled trying to make something appealing of mediocre prints worth reflecting on this transitional moment in the technology of photography. These Polaroid 20” x 24” prints are indeed a marvel to behold.  This is especially true for those of us who remember the Polaroid Instamatic, gooey chemicals, and piles of failed photographs a dollar a pop lying on the floor.

I. W. Taber

Figure 1 - I. W. Taber portrait of Princess Kaiulani, taken in San Francisco c 1897. In the Hawaii State Archives and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 1 – I. W. Taber portrait of Princess Kaiulani, taken in San Francisco c 1897. In the Hawaii State Archives and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Our discussion yesterday about Loïe Fuller and the wonderful performance portrait of her by I. W. Taber begs the obvious question of exactly who Taber was? Isaiah West Taber (1830 – 1912) was an American photographer of the nineteenth century, who practiced in daguerreotypes. ambrotypes, and albumen prints. He was also a dentist and sketch artist and is today most known for his stereoscopic views of the American West. Taber was born in New Bedford, Massachusetts. From 1845-1849 he was a whaler.  He briefly settled as a photographer in California in 1850, but opened his first studio in Syracuse, NY in 1854. In 1864 he returned to San Francisco, working first in the studio of Bradley and Rulofson. He opened his own studio in 1871.

Significantly, in 1880 Taber spent six weeks in Hawaii where he photographed Hawaiian King Kalākaua, on commission. In the following year the King visited Taber’s studio in San Francisco. Taber is also famous for street scenes of San Francisco and portraits of the California Dignitaries of the day. Unfortunately, the great San Francisco earthquake of 1906 and the subsequent fire destroyed his gallery including his collection of negatives and this ended his photographic career.

The quality of Taber’s work is arguably best revealed in two stunning portraits of Hawaiian Princess Kaiulani that were taken during a 1997 visit to San Francisco and the United States in hopes of restoring the Hawaiian Monarchy after its overthrow in 1892. One of these portraits is shown in Figure 1. The dress and hat are truly gorgeous. The book is meant, as it so often does in Western portrait art, to convey erudition. But I think the most captivating aspect of the portrait is the expression at once regal and demur. Kaiulani was only 22 at the time of the portrait. Tragically, she died two years later on March 6, 1899 at the age of 23 of inflammatory rheumatism. Poignantly, her father also said that he thought that since Hawaii was gone, it was fitting for Kaʻiulani to go as well.

 

Mysteries of the Belle Époque – Part III – Loïe Fuller

Figure 1 - Painting of Loie Fuller by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. From the Wikipedia and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 1 – Painting of Loie Fuller by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. From the Wikipedia and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Today I thought that we would get out of the woods and return to the Belle Époque. For some reason the other day the great dancer of that period, Loïe Fuller (1862-1928), came to my mind, and I started searching for photographs and videos of her. Loïe Fuller was a visionary, and in many regards like Evelyn Nesbit, like Sarah Bernhardt, like Anna Pavlova, and like Isadora Duncan she pioneered what performance stars do today – they ride the wave of a shrinking world and the developing technologies that promoted worldwide connectivity.

She was born Marie Louise Fuller outside of Chicago in Fullersburg, Illinois. She began her theatrical career as a professional child actress and later as a “skirt dancer” in burlesque. She was essentially self-taught and developed her own characteristic techniques. Her choreography combined colorful silk costumes illuminated by multi-colored lighting, again by her own design. One of her most famous works was the “Serpentine Dance” and there is a miraculous hand-colored film clip made in 1896 by the Lumiere Brothers of it being perfomed. Apparently, the dancer in this is not Fuller herself but  flame dancer Papinta.

While Fuller became famous in America, she felt underappreciated and after a warm reception in Paris during a European tour persuaded, she was persuaded to remain in France, becoming a regular performer at the Folies Bergère at the Moulin Rouge with works such as her “Fire Dance.” Indeed, one of the reasons that we remember her today is because of paintings and posters of her performances by such artists as Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901). Figure 1 is a painting of her by Toulouse-Lautrec. It is also significant to note that many of Fullers costumes required elaborate technical designs, which she invented and patented.

Not surprisingly, this colorful figure and her flowing costumes and dramatic lighting attracted the great photographers of her day, Searching among them is truly a visual delight. I have chosen here as Figure 2 a portrait of her dancing by Isaiah West Taber (1830 – 1912) I chose this both because of the wonderful sensitivity and expressively captured motion of the image but also because it is so similar to Toluose-Lautrec’s painting.

Figure 2 - Loie Fuller by I. W. Taber. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 2 – Loie Fuller by I. W. Taber. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

American bullfrog – Lithobates catesbeianus

Figure 1 - American bullfrog, Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge, June 17, 2016. (c) DE Wolf 2016.

Figure 1 – American bullfrog, Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge, June 17, 2016. (c) DE Wolf 2016.

Hmm. To a large extent nature photography tends to be a matter of you never know what you are going to capture. Today I went down along the water’s edge and stood quite still in hopes of seeing some of the frogs that have been serenading in a bass voice. As  Figure 1 attests I was not disappointed. So there I am with my big lens at 400 mm shooting a macro-subject perhaps six feet away from me. It was very successful in terms of sharpness and background. The lens performs amazingly well under these circumstances. Frogs are about as wary as any creature in the woods. Also i do have to point out that with macro-photography it is way better to get down with the subject and shoot a portrait into its face. But there was no way that this frog was going to put up with this kind of familiarity. And indeed, as soon as I looked away to adjust the camera he left into the water and retreated beneath the surface. “It is not easy being green.”

Canon T2i with EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens at 400mm, ISO 1600, Aperture Priority AE Mode, 1/2000th sec at f/7.1 with no exposure compensation.

Don’t eat the hand that feeds you

Figure 1 - Don't eat the hand that feeds you. (c) DE Wolf 2016.

Figure 1 – Don’t eat the hand that feeds you. (c) DE Wolf 2016.

Today’s photograph, Figure1, is of my friend’s new puppy, Emma. In a moment of over exhuberance, puppy Emma forgot what they taught her in puppy school. “Don’t eat the hand that feeds you.”

Canon T2i with EF70-200mm f/4L USM lens at 100mm, ISO 1600, Aperture Priority AE Mode, 1/500th sec at f/7.1, with no exposure compensation.